Citing this biography: Boyd, Michelle, "Thomas Bliss and
Margaret Snowe," article, Olive and Eliza, last accessed [current date]."
Thomas Bliss, despite early genealogies' claims, was not at all
likely to have come from Belstone, Devon, England since there is no
evidence to support these claims and Belstone is quite a considerable
distance from Gloucester. Likewise, claims that he was the son of a
Jonathan or Thomas Bliss of Belstone or a member of the Bliss families
of Daventry and Preston Capes are unsupported by primary evidence.
Thomas married first Margaret Snowe 14 April 1616 at St. John
the Baptist church in Gloucester, Gloucestershire, England. Margaret was
buried 4 June 1621 at St. Nicholas church, Gloucester, Gloucestershire,
England. While Margaret's parents are not currently known, there
are a couple of possible candidate couples who could be her
parents.
There are claims that Margaret (Snowe) Bliss was baptized in June of
1586 in Gloucester. The record cited for this, however, is a burial
record, not a baptismal record. An argument has been made that the
clerk accidentally wrote "buried," instead of "baptized," as there is no
other Margaret Snowe in the record.
However:
It was all too common for people to be missed in early parish
registers.
The claim also does not account for the possibility that Margaret
came from a nearby parish. While most people in England at this time
did not move far from their place of birth throughout their lives and
many married someone from their hometown, it was still quite common
for people to meet and marry someone from the next town over or even a
couple of towns over (within a plausible walking distance from home).
Further research is needed in the parish registers in nearby towns.
There is not enough information in the burial record to determine
the age of the Margaret in that record. Therefore, she could have
easily have been any age from infant to an elderly widow. In the
latter case, she could easily have been old enough to have been born
before the 1530s when parish registers first began to be kept, and
therefore, might not show in the records prior to the burial.
If the record was a single burial record in the midst of a list of
baptisms, the idea that the clerk made a mistake would be much more
plausible. But this is not the case here. The record comes from a page
of mixed baptismal, marriage, and burial records in the parish
registers of St. John the Baptist, Gloucester, not separated into
lists of distinct types of records.
Therefore, I have serious reservations about the claims of Margaret
being baptized in June of 1586 and have chosen not to include
that date in the biography above, unless further evidence surfaces.
Thomas married second Margaret Hulings (dau. of John and
Margaret Hulings, of Rodborough, Gloucestershire, England) 18 Oct
1621 at St. Nicholas church, Gloucester, Gloucester, England.
John Homer Bliss states that Thomas arrived in 1636 at Boston,
Suffolk, Massachusetts, settling at Braintree, Norfolk, Massachusetts.
The Blisses then moved to Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut, then to
Weymouth, Norfolk, Massachusetts. They were among the early settlers of
Rehoboth, Bristol, Massachusetts in 1643. Thomas was admitted freeman 18
May 1642 in Cambridge, Middlesex, Massachusetts and 4 Jan 1645 in
Plymouth Colony. He was appointed a fence viewer in 1646 and a surveyor
of highways in 1647.
Thomas's inventory was taken 14 Feb 1650, after he left a nuncupative
will (a will given orally before witnesses, often associated with
situations where the subject of the will did not have the time or
ability to make a written will).
Donald Lines Jacobus gives insight into Margaret (Hulings) Bliss's
personality and her life after Thomas's death: "She proved herself to be
a woman of capacity, raising the younger children, outfitting some of
them at marriage, and yet leaving an estate appraised at £278 when she
died. She survived her husband a third of a century, never remarried,
and left property more than three times the value of what he, wisely as
the event proved, had left to her care when he died. She vigorously
defended her daughter, Mrs. Parsons, when under suspicion of witchcraft
in 1656, but in 1674 a formal charge was made, resulted in the trial and
acquittal of Mrs. Parsons." The UMass Mary Bliss Parsons site states,
"After the death of Thomas Bliss, Mary's mother, Margaret, moved the
family to Springfield, where the family prospered despite the loss of
the father. Her sons were successful in business, and court records
indicate that Margaret herself was quite business minded and well able
to defend her property in several legal disputes."
Margaret died 28 Aug 1684 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts. Her
will was dated 25 June 1684.
Thomas and Margaret (Snowe)’s children are:
1
Thomas
Bliss, baptized 23 Jan 1617/8 at St. John the Baptist
church, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, England, resided in Hartford,
Hartford, Connecticut as early as 1640, removed to Saybrook,
Middlesex, Connecticut, married Elizabeth -- in the latter
end of October 1644 in Saybrook, Middlesex, Connecticut, removed
to Norwich, New London, Connecticut in 1660, died 15 Apr 1688 in
Norwich, New London, Connecticut, will dated 13 Apr 1688 and
probated 13 Jun 1688 at New London, New London, Connecticut.
Wife: Elizabeth --, d. 28 Feb 1699/1700, according
to Caulkins.
2
Ann
Bliss, married Robert Chapman 29 Apr 1642 in
Saybrook, Middlesex, Connecticut, died 20 Nov 1685 in Saybrook,
Middlesex, Connecticut.
Husband: Robert Chapman, apprenticed at age 15,
arrived 26 Dec 1635 at Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, a founder
of Saybrook, Middlesex, Connecticut, arriving there in early Apr
1636, town clerk at Saybrook, representative to the General Court,
lieutenant of the train band, wrote a letter to his children in
1687, d. 13 Oct 1687 in Saybrook, Middlesex, Connecticut, a
captain.
3
Sarah Bliss, baptized
23 Apr 1620 at St. Nicholas church, Gloucester, Gloucestershire,
England, likely died young.
Thomas and Margaret (Hulings)’ children are:
4
Nathaniel Bliss,
baptized 28 Dec 1622 in Rodborough, Gloucestershire, England,
married Catherine Chapin d. 4 Feb 1711/2 in Springfield,
Hampden, Massachusetts) 20th day 9th mo 1646, buried 18th day 9th
mo 1654 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
Wife: Catherine Chapin, prob. b. 1626 in Berry
Pomeroy, Devon, England to Samuel and Cicely (Penny) Chapin
(according to Jacobus), m. 2) Thomas Gilbert 31st day 4th
mo 1655 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts and 3) Samuell
Marshfeild 28 Dec 1664 in Springfield, Hampden,
Massachusetts.
5
Mary Bliss, married Joseph
Parsons 26th day 9th mo 1646 at Hartford, Hartford,
Connecticut. Mary was twice accused of witchcraft. She had
previously had "fits so severe that her husband locked her up to
keep her from leaving the house" (UMass site) and the Parsonses
were fairly well-to-do (thus, causing jealousy amongst
neighbors)--both may be factors leading her to be subject of
rumors of witchcraft. In 1656, Joseph Parsons brought a case
against Sarah (Lyman) Bridgeman for slander against Mary. Sarah
and others on her side countered with accusations that Mary was a
witch that had caused the deaths of one William Hannum's cow and
one of the Bridgeman children. Mary's mother Margaret testified
against Sarah and others recanted their testimony. Sarah was found
guilty of slander and sentenced to apologize or pay a fine. In
1674, Sarah's son-in-law, Samuel Bartlett, at the urging of
Sarah's widower, James, brought a complaint against Mary, after
Samuel's young wife (and James's daughter) died unexpectedly. Mary
was tried of witchcraft and her body was searched for witch marks.
The case was sent to the Court of Assistants in Boston, Suffolk,
Massachusetts on 2 Mar 1675 and Mary was committed to prison. Mary
was acquitted of witchcraft 13 May 1675. The UMass site states
that, "Mary went on to live almost 30 years more, and appears to
have made a considerable fortune with the money." She was still
subject to rumors. However, according to the UMass site, "In 1711,
Mary Parsons, granddaughter of Mary (Bliss) Parsons, married
Ebenezer Bridgman, grandson of Sarah Bridgman. Mary Parsons
herself was alive to witness the union, although no accounts
survive to detail her reaction to it. The young couple removed to
Belchertown and had three children, Joseph, Ebenezer, and Mary.
That their children were named after both of Mary's parents
perhaps might indicate that they were still on good terms with her
side of the family." She died 29 Jan 1711/2 in Springfield,
Hampden, Massachusetts.
Mary had a servant (probably a slave), Tobee, who died 14
Dec 1711 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
Note about supposed portraits: There are a couple of
portraits of women that have, in recent years, being erroneously
identified as Mary (Bliss) Parsons. These are NOT portraits of
Mary. The portrait of the woman and child is actually of Mrs. Elizabeth Freake. I am not sure of the
identity of the sitter of the portrait of the older woman. It
seems that an otherwise valuable UMass webpage about Mary's
witchcraft trail used both portraits as generic illustrations of
women of that era but did not label them, thus causing the
confusion. See Erika Mailman's blog post for more
information.)
Husband: Joseph Parsons, took oath of fidelity 19
May 1669 in Massachusetts, a cornet, d. 9 Oct 1683 in Springfield,
Hampden, Massachusetts, inventory presented 25 Mar 1684.
6
Lawrence Bliss,
married Lydia Wright 25th day 8th mo 1654 in Springfield,
Hampden, Massachusetts, died in 1676 in Springfield, Hampden,
Massachusetts.
Wife: Lydia Wright, dau. of Samuel and Margaret
Wright (according to Jacobus), m. 2) John Norton 31
Oct 1678 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, 3) John Lamb
26 Jan 1687, and 4) George Colton 1 Mar 1691/2 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, d. 13 Feb 1699 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
7
Hannah
Bliss, died 25th day 11th mo 1660 in Springfield, Hampden,
Massachusetts.
8
John
Bliss, married Patience Burt 7 Oct 1667 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, died 20 Sep 1702 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
Wife: Patience Burt, b. and bp. 18th 6th mo 1645 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts to Henry and Ulalia
(March) Burt (mother's name is according to Jacobus).
9
Samuel
Bliss, baptized 4 Feb 1637/8 at St. Mary de Crypt church,
Gloucester, Gloucestershire, England, married Mary Leonard
10 Nov 1665 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, died 23 Mar
1720 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
Wife: Mary Leonard, b. 14 Jul 1647 in Springfield,
Hampden, Massachusetts to John and Sarah (Heald) Leonard
(mother's name is according to Jacobus), d. 1 Jan 1723/4 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
10
Sarah
Bliss, married 1) John Scott 20th day 5th mon 1659
in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts and 2) Samuel Terry
19 Nov 1690 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, referred to in
Winthrop's Medical Journal as "John Scot his wife wido
Bliss her daughter," died 27 Sep 1705 in Springfield, Hampden,
Massachusetts.
Husband 1: John Scott, fined for neglecting his
fence in 1665, 1673, and 1678 but appointed as a fence viewer in
1666 and 1676, fought in the Falls Fight in 1676, d. 2 Jan 1689/90
in Suffield, Hartford, Connecticut (according to Jacobus),
inventory presented Mar 1690.
Husband 2: Samuel Terry, b. abt. 1633, bound to
William Pynchon (prob. for paying his passage to America), then to
Benjamin Cooley 15 Oct 1650 to learn the linen weaver's trade, m.
1) Ann Lobdell 3 Jan 1659/60, constable in Springfield,
Hampden, Massachusetts, d. 1730 in Springfield, Hampden,
Massachusetts.
11
Elizabeth
Bliss, a twin of Hester (as mentioned in Winthrop's Medical
Journal), married Miles Morgan 15 Feb 1669 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
Husband: Miles Morgan, perhaps b. abt. 1616 in
Llandorff, Glamorgan, Wales (according to Cutter), arrived in Apr
1636 at Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, one of the founders of
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts and second-in-command there,
m. 1) Prudence Gilbert, fought in King Philip's War, a
sergeant, d. 28 May 1699 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
12
Hester
Bliss, a twin of Elizabeth (as mentioned in Winthrop's
Medical Journal), married Edward Foster 26 Dec 1661 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts, died 12 Jun 1683 in
Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
Husband: Edward Foster, m. 2) Sarah Marshfield
(widow Miller) 17 Jan 1683/4 (according to Jacobus), d. 22 Feb
1719/20 in Springfield, Hampden, Massachusetts.
Summary of Sources
Vital Records of Norwich Connecticut, 1659-1848. (Online database.
AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society,
2007.) Originally published as: Vital Records of Norwich, 1659-1848.
Hartford, Society of colonial wars in the state of Connecticut,
1913.
Ancestry.com. Connecticut, Town Marriage Records, pre-1870
(Barbour Collection) [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA:
Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006. Original data: White, Lorraine
Cook, ed. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records.
Vol. 1-55. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co.,
1994-2002.
Ancestry.com. Connecticut Town Death Records, pre-1870 (Barbour
Collection) [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com
Operations Inc, 2006. Original data: White, Lorraine Cook, ed. The
Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55.
Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1994-2002.
Ancestry.com. Connecticut, Deaths and Burials Index, 1650-1934
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.,
2011. Original data: "Connecticut Deaths and Burials, 1772–1934."
Index. FamilySearch, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2009, 2010. Index entries
derived from digital copies of original and compiled records.
Caulkins, Francis Manwaring, History of Norwich, Connecticut,
H.P. Haven, 1874.
Perkins, Mary Elizabeth, Old Houses of the Antient Town of
Norwich, 1660-1800, Norwich, CT: Press of the Bulletin Co.,
1895.
Jacobus, Donald Lines, "New London (Conn.) Probate Record," The
American Genealogist, Vol. 10, 1933, p. 36.
Ancestry.com. U.S., New England Marriages Prior to 1700
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc,
2012. Original data: Torry, Clarence A. New England Marriages
Prior to 1700. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing
Co., 2004.
Bliss, John Homer, Genealogy of the Bliss family in America
from about the year 1550 to 1880, Boston, Mass.: J.H. Bliss,
1881.
Ancestry.com. England, Select Marriages, 1538–1973 [database
on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014.
Original data: England, Marriages, 1538–1973. Salt Lake City, Utah:
FamilySearch, 2013.
Ancestry.com. Gloucestershire, England, Church of England
Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1813 [database on-line].
Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. Original data:
Gloucestershire Anglican Parish Registers. Gloucestershire Archives,
Gloucestershire, England.
Ancestry.com. Massachusetts, Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.,
2011. Original data: Town and City Clerks of Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Vital and Town Records. Provo, UT: Holbrook Research
Institute (Jay and Delene Holbrook).
Vital Records of Springfield, Massachusetts to 1850. Boston,
Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2002. (Online
database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical
Society, 2008.)
Cutter, William Richard, Genealogical and Personal Memoirs
Relating to the Families of the State of Massachusetts, vol.
1, New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Company, 1910, p. 63.
Washburn, Emory, Sketches of the Judicial History of
Massachusetts from 1630 to the Revolution in 1775, C.C. Little
and J. Brown, 1840, pgs. 62-63.
Vital Records of Saybrook 1647-1834 (Online Database:
AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society,
2008), (Originally published as: Vital Records of Saybrook
1647-1834. Hartford, The Connecticut Historical Society and the
Connecticut Society of the Order of the Founders and Patriots of
America, 1952.)
Ancestry.com. Massachusetts Applications of Freemen, 1630-91
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc,
2000. Original data: Paige, Lucius R.. List of Freemen of
Massachusetts. Boston, MA, USA: New England Historical and
Genealogical Society, 1849.
Ancestry.com. Hartford, Connecticut Probate Records, 1639-1700
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc,
2000. Original data: A Digest of the Early Connecticut Probate
Records, Hartford District, 1635-1700. Vol. I. n.p., 1906.
Records related to Thomas and Margaret (Snowe) Bliss but not copied
below due to copyright considerations:
Jacobus, Donald Lines, Hale, House and Related Families,
Mainly of the Connecticut River Valley, Baltimore, MD:
Genealogical Publishing Co., 2001.
Hyde, Myrtle Stevens, "Thomas and Margaret Hulins Bliss of
Hartford, Connecticut," The American Genealogist, Vol. 52,
Oct 1976, pgs. 193-197.
Hyde, Myrtle Stevens, "The Marriage of Thomas Bliss and Margaret
Hulins," The American Genealogist, Vol. 60, Oct 1984, p.
202.
Bennett, Anne Selene, "The First Wife and Older Children of Thomas
Bliss of Gloucester, England, and Hartford, Connecticut," The
American Genealogist, vol. 91, Jan 2019, pgs. 43-45.
Richardson, Douglas, "The English Origin of Thomas Marshfield of
Dorchester, Mass., and Windsor, Conn.; New Light on His Wife and
Children," The American Genealogist, vol. 63, Jul 1988, p.
161-163.
Halseth, Judith H., "Autobiographical Letter of Robert1 Chapman of
Saybrook, Connecticut," New England Historic and Genealogical
Register, vol. 159, 2005, p. 316.
Historic Northampton and UMass IT Center for Educational Software
Development at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, The
Goody Parsons Educational Web Site, https://ccbit.cs.umass.edu/parsons/hnmockup/home.html,
retrieved 21 Oct 2017. (Note: There are a couple of portraits of
women on this site. These are NOT portraits of Mary (Bliss) Parsons.
The portrait of the woman and child is actually of Mrs. Elizabeth
Freake. Regarding the portrait of the older woman, see the Mailman
blog post cited below.)
Starr, Frank Farnsworth, The Miles Morgan Family of
Springfield, Massachusetts, Hartford, CT, 1904. The book can
be found online at Google Books.
Parsons, Henry, Parsons Family: Descendants of Cornet Joseph
Parsons, vol. 1, New York: Frank Allaben Genealogical Company,
1912. The book can be found online at Google Books.
Photos
Click each thumbnail to open a full-size version of the image in a new
tab.
Source Materials
Click on each category below to expand and see the copies of sources
used to create the biography above (copyrighted and other restricted
items are listed in the summary of sources above but not included
below). Click again to close.
Cutter's Genealogical and Personal Memoirs
(XVIII) Miles Morgan, the immigrant ancestor, was born probably in
Llandorff, Glamorgan county, Wales, in 1616. He was named perhaps
after Miles Morgan, captain of British army who perished with Sir
Humphrey Gilbert, half brother of Sir Walter Raleigh. He removed to
Bristol, England, a few years before he came to America. He came to
Boston, Massachusetts, in April, 1636, with his two brothers. The
eldest, James, settled in New London, Connecticut ; John went to
Virginia and Miles joined the colonists and became one of the founders
of Springfield, Massachusetts. Next to Colonel Pynchon, he was the
most important and useful man in the Springfield colony. He was made
second in command though he was the youngest of the company. He was
the only pioneer, in fact, who was less than twenty-one years of age
when admitted. He drew land for his home lot on the south side of the
Ferry lane. At present the site of the original Morgan dwelling house
is occupied by the repair shop of the Connecticut River railroad. He
was a brave and intrepid Indian fighter in the frequent conflicts on
the frontiers. In 1675, in King Philip's war, the Morgan house was
attacked by the Indians, but so bravely was it defended by Miles
Morgan and his sons, that the Indians retired after an unsuccessful
siege. Peletiah Morgan, one of these sons, was killed the following
year at what is now Chicopee. In civil life Colonel Pynchon was the
grocer and Miles Morgan the butcher. He was a wise counsellor and a
sturdy tiller of the soil. A handsome monument was erected at
Springfield in 1879 in testimony of the services of Miles Morgan in
settling the town, governing the colony, fighting the Indians in 1675
when Springfield was sacked and burned and many of the little colony
killed. He died May 28, 1699, aged eighty-four. He married, about
1643, Prudence Gilbert, who died November 14, 1660. He married
(second) February 15, 1669, Elizabeth Bliss. Children: i. Mary, born
December 14, 1644. 2. Jonathan, September 16. 1646. 3. David, July 23,
1648. 4. Peletiah, May 17, 1650, killed 1675; unmarried. 5. Isaac,
March 12, 1652. 6. Lydia, February 8, 1654. 7. Hannah, February 11,
1656. 8. Mercy. May 18, 1658. Child of second wife: 9. Nathaniel, June
14, 1671, mentioned below.
(XIX) Nathaniel Morgan, son of Miles Morgan, was born June 14, 1671,
in Springfield. At the age of nineteen he married, January 19, 1 69 1,
Hannah Bond, who died June 7, 1751. He lived on the west side of the
river, in West Springfield, on what is now Chicopee street. The lot is
at present owned by N. Loomis, on the east side of the street. He died
August 30, 1752, aged eighty-one years. Children: i. Nathaniel, born
February 16, 1692. 2. Samuel, 1694, died December, 1699- 3. Ebenezer,
1696. 4. Hannah, 1698. 5. Miles, 1700. 6. Joseph, December 3, 1702,
mentioned below. 7. James, 1705. 8. Isaac, 1708, died November 7,
1796. 9. Elizabeth, 1710.
Source: Cutter, William Richard, Genealogical and Personal Memoirs
Relating to the Families of the State of Massachusetts, vol. 1,
New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Company, 1910, p. 63.
History of Norwich, Connecticut
Page 167-8:
Thomas Bliss, Senior and Junior, had house-lots and divisions of land
in Hartford, as early as 1640. The senior died in Hartford, leaving
nine children, and his widow, Margaret, apparently a woman of
resolute, independent character, removed with the younger part of the
family to Springfield. Thomas Bliss, Junior, is afterwards found at
Saybrook, where his marriage and the births of six -children are
recorded. The list is repeated with some variation of date and the
addition of two more children, at Norwich. The wife's family name is
not given in either place. "Thomas and Elizabeth Bliss were married
the latter end of October, 1644."
The allotments of Thomas Bliss in Saybrook were eastward of the river
in what is now Lyme. His house-lot of thirty acres lay between John
Ompsted (Olmstead) on the north, and John Lay south. He sold it, July
23, 1662, to John Comstock. His home-lot in Norwich was also near to
that of John Olmstead, extending originally, at the north-west, to the
pent highway. That part where the house stands, has never been
alienated. Seven generations have dwelt on the same spot, and the
house is supposed not to have been entirely rebuilt since it was
erected by the first proprietor.
Thomas Bliss died April 15, 1688. His will, executed two days before
his death, was proved at New London, before Edward Palmes, June 13,
and allowed by Sir Edmund Andress at Boston; this being the period
when that delegated despot arrogated to himself supreme authority over
the courts of New England. The will recognizes wife Elizabeth, son
Samuel, and six daughters. His oldest son, Thomas, had died without
issue, Jan. 29, 1681. Elizabeth, the relict, died Feb. 28, 1699-1700.
Samuel Bliss married, Dec. 8, 1681, Anna, daughter of John Elderkin.
Five of the daughters married as follows:
Elizabeth married Edward Smith of New London, June 7, 1663.
Sarah m. 1st, Thomas Sluman, Dec, 1668; 2d, Solomon Tracy.
Mary m. David Calkins of New London.
Deliverance (recorded also Deliver and Dolinda) m. Daniel Perkins of
Norwich.
Anne, one of the first-lborn daughters of Norwich, m. Josiah Rockwell,
1688.
Rebecca, the youngest daughter, born in 1663, has not been traced.
In the inventory of Thomas Bliss, his estate is estimated at
£182.17.7. He had land, besides his home-lot, over the river, — on the
Little Plain, — at the Great Plain, — at the Falls, — in Yantic
meadow, — in meadow at Beaver Brook, — in pasture east of the town,—
and on Westward hill.
This illustrates the prudential course of the early rulers of the
plantation in regard to the common lands. They were divided in small
quantities at short intervals, corresponding to the growth and
necessities of the town and the ability of the owners to clear them up
and place them under cultivation.
Page 203:
Solomon Tracy was a physician, and the second in Norwich of whom we
find any notice, — John Olmstead being the first. He was united in
marriage, Nov. 23, 1676, to Sarah, daughter of Simon Huntington. She
died in 1683, and he married Sarah, daughter of Thomas Bliss and
relict of Thomas Sluman.
...
Solomon Tracy, second and youngest son of Solomon, removed to
Canterbury.
Source: Caulkins, Francis Manwaring, History of Norwich,
Connecticut, H.P. Haven, 1874.
Old Houses of the Antient [sic] Town of Norwich
Pages 31-32:
Just beyond the little lane or "highway to Great Plain" lies the
home-lot of Thomas Bliss, of five and a quarter acres, abutting east
on the Town street 20 rods, south on the highway to Great Plain 58
rods, west on the river 16 rods, and north on the land of Stephen
Backus 36 rods. This extends from the lane to the land of the late
Benjamin Huntington.
Thomas Bliss was the son of Thomas Bliss, who was born in Okehampton,
in the parish of Belstone, County Devonshire, England, came to
Braintree (now Quincy), Mass., in 1635, and from thence went to
Hartford, where he died in 1650. His widow, Margaret, an enterprising,
capable woman, went with her other children to Springfield, Mass.,
where her descendants still remain. But the son, Thomas, though a
home-lot had been assigned to him at Hartford, moved to Saybrook. He
married, in 1644, Elizabeth, and came with the first settlers to
Norwich in 1660.
His eldest son, Thomas, died in 1681-2, and the father in 1688,
leaving to his only surviving son, Samuel, the house and home lot.
Source: Perkins, Mary Elizabeth, Old Houses of the Antient Town
of Norwich, 1660-1800, Norwich, CT: Press of the Bulletin Co.,
1895.
Genealogy of the Bliss Family in America
Pages 32-5:
THOMAS, of Rehoboth, Mass., son of Jonathan Bliss, of Belstone,
England, was born at B., and upon the death of his father in 1636,
emigrated to America, landing at Boston, whence he removed to
Braintree, Mass., thence to Hartford, Conn., and from there back to
Weymouth, near Braintree, Mass., from which place he removed in 1643
with many others and commenced a new settlement which they called
Rehoboth.1 He was made a freeman in Cambridge, Mass., May
18th, 1642, and in the Plymouth Colony Jan. 4th, 1645. June 9th of the
same year he drew a lot (No. 30,) on the Great Plain, in Seekonk. In
1646 he was appointed "to view the fence of the town lots," and in
1647 surveyor of highways. He died at Rehoboth in June 1649, and was
undoubtedly buried in the old cemetery at Seekonk, Mass., (now
Rumford, East Providence, R. I.,) where the first pastor of the new
colony was afterwards interred. But it is a matter of great regret
that the authorities having the lands in charge have allowed the
growth of unsightly weeds, bushes and brambles, to such an extent as
to render the identification of the earlier graves well nigh
impossible, even where the ravages of time have spared an occasional
inscription. [And the same may be said of the old cemetery south of
Rehoboth village.] Another unfortunate circumstance during the early
part of the nineteenth century, the destruction by fire of the records
of the first church, has deprived their posterity of much valuable
information concerning the first settlers in Rehoboth. In the "N. E.
Genealogical Register," vol. 4, p. 282, it is stated that Thomas Bliss
1 will was dated the 8th of June, 1649, and also that it was put into
court on the 8th, — one of which statements has been considered
erroneous ; but perhaps the will was deposited, for safe keeping, in
the hands of the person who officiated as surrogate. The instrument
mentions his son Jonathan, to whom he devised his house; his eldest
daughter, whose first name is not given, but is referred to as the
wife of Thomas Williams ; Mary, wife of Nathaniel Harmon, of Braintree
; son-in-law, Nicholas Ide,* who was probably a son of his wife, Mrs.
Ide, or Hyde, (by a previous husband,) who had perhaps married a
daughter ; and his son, Nathaniel. (His property was inventoried at
£117, 16s, 4d.) We gather, then, that he had issue :
20. 2Jonathan, b. ab. 1625, d. ab. 1687.
21. A daughter who m. Thomas Williams.
22. Mary, who m. Nathaniel Harmon, Braintree, Mass.
23. Nathaniel, of Rehoboth or Hingham, Mass., was probably married and
had a family; for there was a "Margaret, daughter of Nathaniel Bliss,
b. at Hingham on the 12th of the 9th month, (November?) 1649," which
was the same year in which the first child of his brother Jonathan was
born, — and there was no other Nathaniel in that neighborhood at that
early date. It is possible, therefore, that Nathaniel settled in
Hingham. And as no descendants have been found or identified bearing
the family name, it is presumed he had no sons who lived to maturity.
[The Town Clerk of Hingham writes that there is no record there of any
Bliss family.]
THOMAS, of Hartford, Saybrook, and Norwich, Conn., (son of Thomas and
Margaret Bliss, of Hartford, Conn.,) was born in England, and removed
to America with his father in 1635. Soon after his father's death he
removed to Saybrook. Here his allotment of land was east of
Connecticut River, in what is now Lyme, and his home lot lay between
John Ompsted (Olmstead) on the north, and John Lay on the south. He
sold his land here July 23, 1662, to John Comstock and Richard Smith,
having removed his family to Norwich,3 Conn., two or three
years previous. He was married Oct. 30th, 1644, to a wife named
Elizabeth, and they had six children born to them in Saybrook, and
their seventh child, named Anne, born in 1660, was the second English
child born in Norwich. His allotment in Norwich was "next to Sergeant
Leffingwell, (opposite, according to the ancient map,) on the street
as it runs south, five acres and a fourth, with a lane on the south
leading to a watering place at the river." This homestead is still
occupied by his descendants, (1880,) seven generations of the same
name having successively inherited the homestead and dwelt therein, —
the property being held under the original deed, — and the house
itself, in its frame work is doubtless the original habitation built
by the first grantee. In a country where the tenure is allodial, and
there are no rights of primogeniture or entailment, instances of two
hundred years of family ownership are not very common.
In (1680 ?) Thomas Bliss and Matthew Griswold were appointed agents by
the town of Saybrook to "lay out a lot of land to an Indian named The
Giant," near Black Point, in what is now East Lyme, Conn. The locality
is still called "The Giant's Neck."
The energy, sound health, and good judgment of Thomas Bliss brought
great prosperity, which is evidenced by his having made a will; for
only those who had considerable property to dispose of did so, as it
was a very expensive affair in those days, for the tyranny and
rapacity of Sir Edmund Andros compelled the colonists to carry every
such instrument to Boston to prove, and have recorded, in order that
he (Sir Edmund) might avail himself of the fees of that office towards
supporting the state in which he aspired to live; for he never
appeared in the streets without guards, or two or three servants
following him, — and it was quite as easy to obtain access to the King
of England as to his ape, the governor of these colonies.
Thomas Bliss' will is dated April 13th, 1688, two days before his
death; and in it provision was made for his wife Elizabeth and six
daughters, and his only living son, Samuel, who was at that time
thirty-one years of age. His estate was estimated at £182, 17s. 7d. He
had land, besides his home lot, " over the river — on the Little Plain
— at the Great Plain — at the Falls — in the Yantic meadow — in meadow
at Beaver Brook — in pasture east of the town — and on Westward hill."
Issue :
24. Elizabeth, b. at Saybrook, Conn., Nov. 20, 1645, m. June 7, 1663,
Edward Smith, of New London, Conn. This couple, with their son John,
aet. 15, died of an epidemic disease in 1689 — the son July 8th, the
wife July 10th, and Mr. S. July 14th. A son, (Capt. Obadiah, b. 1677)
and six daughters went to reside at Norwich with relatives.
25. Sarah, b. at Saybrook, Aug. 26, 1647, rn. Dec. 1668, Thomas
Sluman, Norwich, and had six children. He died in 1683, and she
afterwards m. April 8, 1686, Dr. Solomon Tracy, of Norwich, by whom
she had one son. She d. Aug. 29, 1730. Dr. T. died July 9, 1732.
26. Mary, b. at Saybrook, Conn., Feb. 7, 1649, m. about 1672-3, David
son of Dea. Hugh and Ann Caulkins, of New London, Conn., (a "Welchman
who came to this country about 1640, stopped at Marshfield for a short
season, then removed to Lynn, Mass., thence to New London about 1652,
and finally to Norwich, Conn., about 1659.) He had the estate of his
father in that part of New London now known as Waterford, near
Niantic. From this union has descended the modest and diligent
historian of Norwich and New London, — Miss Frances M. Caulkins, who
was widely known as one of the leading antiquarian writers of her day.
David Caulkins d. Nov. 25, 1717.
27. Thomas, b. at Saybrook, Conn., March 3, 1652, d. Jan. 29, 1682,
probably unmarried.
28. Deliverance, b. at S., Aug. 10, 1655, m. June 8, 1682, Daniel
Perkins, of Norwich, Conn.
29. *Samuel, b. at S., Dec. 9, 1657, d. Dec. 30, 1731.
30. Anne, b. at Norwich, Sept. 15, 1660, m. April 8, 1688, Josiah
Rockwell, of N., and d. Feb. 19, 1714-15. He d. March 18, 1728. Josiah
Rockwell was a son of Josiah Rockwell and Rebecca Loomis, of Windsor?
Conn. A son Daniel, b. Oct. 24, 1689, m. Nov. 23, 1715, Tabitha
Hartshorn, and d. in 1746, leaving several children, among whom was
Daniel, jr., b. June 28, 1724, who m. Dec. 29, 1746, Mindwell Bliss,
daughter of Samuel Bliss and Sarah Packer, of Norwich, Conn.
31. Rebeckah, born at Norwich, March 18, 1663, m. April 8, 1686,
Israel Lathrop, of N., and d. Aug. 22, 1737. He d. March 28, 1733.
1The original purchase of land of Massasoit, in 1641,
comprising the town of Rehoboth, was "a tract eight miles square," and
embraced what now constitutes the towns of Rehoboth, Seekonk, and
Pawtucket ; the second purchase now forms a part of Swansey and
Barrington ; and the third and last was called the " North Purchase,"
— now Attleboro, Mass., and Cumberland, R. I.
The celebrated Roger Williams, who believed it "the prerogative of man
to think as he pleased and to speak as he thought," arrived at
Rehoboth (then Seekonk) in the Spring of 1636, but soon crossed the
stream and took up his abode in what is now the beautiful city of
Providence, R.I.
The first white settler within the original limits of Rehoboth was
"one Master William Blackstone," a minister who settled there about
1637, and who is described as a sort of "Ishmaelite in religion," who
left England through a dislike to the " Lord Bishops," and was early
displeased, with the " Lord Brethren." He d. May 26, 1675.
A number of emigrants from Hingham and Weymouth, Mass., soon settled
at Seekonk, among whom were the Rev. Samuel Newman and a majority of
his church at W., — Mr. Thomas Bliss being one of the number, — and in
1645 the proprietors were incorporated town wise under the scriptural
name of Rehoboth.
2It is not positively known who this Nicholas Ide m., but
he had a son, Lieut. Nicholas Ide, b. Nov. (1654?) whom. Dec. 27,
(1678?) Mary Ormsby. Issue: Nathaniel, (d. March 14, 1702-3,) Jacob,
Martha, Patience, John, and Benjamin,— all b. in Rehoboth, 1678-1693.
By a second wife, Eliza, he had a son, Nicholas, jr., b. in
Attleborough, July 25, 1697. Lieut. Nicholas d. June 5, 1723.
3The town of Norwich was purchased from the Indian sachems
of the Mohegan tribe in June, 1659, and settled that year by
thirty-five men, most of whom were from Saybrook, Conn., Thomas Bliss
being one of the number. The following year, 1660, the Rev. James
Fitch, pastor of the church at Saybrook, and the greater part of his
church removed to Norwich, where Mr. F. officiated as pastor until
about the year 1696, when by reason of age and infirmity he resigned
the pastorate, and in 1702 removed to the new town of Lebanon, Conn.,
where he soon died. The original tract of Norwich was "9 miles
square," the consideration given the Indians being £70.
Source: Bliss, John Homer, Genealogy of the Bliss family in
America from about the year 1550 to 1880. Boston, Mass.: J.H.
Bliss, 1881.
Copies of church records are shown below as thumbnails. Click on each
thumbnail to view a larger version of the record in another tab.
St. John the Baptist, Gloucester
Under 1616:
"Thomas Blisse and Margaret Snowe were Maried the xiiijth day of
Aprill 1616"
Reference Number: P154/9 IN 1/1
Under 1617[/18]:
"Thomas Blisse the sonne of Thomas Blisse was Baptized the
xxiijth day of Januarie 1617"
Reference Number: P154/9 IN 1/1
St. Nicholas, Gloucester
Under 1620:
"Sarah the daughter of Thomas Blisse was baptized Apr: 23:"
Reference Number: P154/15 IN 1/1
Under 1621:
"Margret the wife of Thomas Blisse was buryed June the 4th"
Reference Number: P154/15 IN 1/1
Under 1621:
"Thomas Blisse and Margret Hulings weere married October the
18th"
Reference Number: P154/15 IN 1/1
Rodborough
Under 1622:
"Nathaniell the sonne of Thomas Bliss was baptized the eight and
twentieth daye of December"
Reference Number: GDR/V1/198
St. Mary de Crypt, Gloucester
Under 1637[/38]:
"Samuel sonne of Thomas Blisse Bap: febr. 4"
Reference Number: GDR/V1/111
Source: Ancestry.com. Gloucestershire, England, Church of England
Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1813 [database on-line]. Provo,
UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. Original data:
Gloucestershire Anglican Parish Registers. Gloucestershire Archives,
Gloucestershire, England.
England Select Marriages
Name: Thomas Blisse
Gender: Male
Marriage Date: 18 Oct 1621
Marriage Place: Saint Nicholas, Gloucester,
Gloucester, England
Spouse: Margret Hulinges
FHL Film Number: 855634
Source: Ancestry.com. England, Select Marriages, 1538–1973 [database
on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014.
Original data: England, Marriages, 1538–1973. Salt Lake City, Utah:
FamilySearch, 2013.
Massachusetts, Town and Vital Records
Name: Margaret Bliss
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 28 Aug 1684
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Name: Nathaniell Bliss
Event Type: Burial
Death Date: abt 1654
Burial Date: 18 Sep 1654
Burial Place: Springfield, Massachusetts [Transcribed text: Nathaniell Bliss was buried 18th of ye 9 mon
1654]
Name: Miles Morgan
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 28 May 1699
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Name: Edward Foster
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 22 Feb 1719
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Name: Samuel Bliss
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 23 Mar 1720
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Spouse Name: Mary Bliss
Name: Mary Leonard Jr
Event Type: Birth
Birth Date: 14 Jul 1647
Birth Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Father Name: John Leonard
Name: Sarah Bliss
Event Type: Marriage
Marriage Date: 20 May 1659
Marriage Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Spouse Name: John Scot [Transcribed text: John Scot joyned in marriage to Sarah Bliss 20
of ye 5 mon 1659]
Name: John Bliss
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 20 Sep 1702
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Name: Patience Burt
Event Type: Baptism
Baptism Date: 18 Aug 1645
Baptism Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Father Name: Henry Burt
Name: Lawrence Bliss
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 1676
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Name: Mary Parsons
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 29 Jan 1711
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Spouse Name: Com Joseph Parsons
Name: Cornet Joseph Parsons
Event Type: Death
Death Date: 9 Oct 1683
Death Place: Springfield, Massachusetts
Source: Ancestry.com. Massachusetts, Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.,
2011. Original data: Town and City Clerks of Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Vital and Town Records. Provo, UT: Holbrook Research
Institute (Jay and Delene Holbrook).
Vital Records of Springfield, Massachusetts to 1850
Nathaniell Bliss & Katheryne Chapin were married 9 mon: 20 day
1646
nathaniell Bliss was Buried the 18th of the 9 mon: 1654
Thomas Gilbert joyned in marriage to Katherine Bliss Widd 31th 4th mo:
1655
Samuell Marshfeild joyned in marryage with Widdow Katharine Gilbert
December the 28. 1664
Kathrien marshfeild who was wife to Samll marshfeild was sick and
died. feb: 4: 1711/12
Febr. 15. 1669 Serja Miles Morgan & Elizabeth Bliss Joined in
Mariage
miles morgan dyed the 28th day of may 1699
Edward Foster was Joined in Mariage to Hester Bliss: Decembr 26th
1661.
Esther Foster was sicke & died June: 12: 1683.
Edward Foster Died February the 22: 1719/20
Samuel Bliss & Mary Leonard married Nov: 10: 1665
Samuel Bliss the Husband of Mary Bliss Died March 23d. 1720
wido Mary Bliss was Sick & Died January 1st. 1723/4
John Scott joyned in marriage to Sarah Bliss the 20th 5th mon. 1659.
Samll Terrey widowr & widow Sarah Scot were joined in marriage
Nov. 19: 1690
Sarah Terrey the wife of Samuel Terrey was Sick & died Sept: 27:
1705.
John Bliss & Patience Burt were joyned in marriage Oct: 7th 1667.
John Bliss was Sicke & died Sept. 20. 1702
Patience Burt the daughter of Henry [torn] borne 6 mon: 18 day. 1645./
& baptised.
Hannah Bliss daughter of margritt Bliss dyed the 25th of the .11. mon
1660
Lawrence Bliss joyned in marriage to Lidia Wright the 25th of 8th mon
1654.
Laurence Bliss died [blank] 1676.
John Norton & Lydia Bliss widow were joined in Marriage: Octo:
31th: 1678
Jan 26 1687 John Lamb widdower & Lidia Norton widdow Joined in
Marriage
Quartermaster George Colton & Widow Lydia Lamb were joined in
marriage March. 1. 1691/2
Lyddia Colton the wife of george Colton dyed the 13th day of Febuary
1699
Joseph Parsons & mary Blisse were joyned together in mariage 9
mon: 26 day 1646. at Hartforde.
mrs Mary Parsons the wife of Cornet Joseph Parsons was sick & died
Jan. 29. 1711/12
Tobee the negro Servt to wido. Mary Parsons was Sicke & died Dec:
14. 1711
Cornet Joseph Parsons was Sicke & died octobr: 9: 1683:
Source: Vital Records of Springfield, Massachusetts to 1850. Boston,
Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2002. (Online
database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical
Society, 2008.)
Vital Records of Norwich, Connecticut
The names & ages of children of Thomas Bliss are as ffolloweth
Elisabeth Blis was borne in November Anno Dom 1645
Sarah Bliss was borne in Aguft Anno 1647
Mary Bliss was borne in ffebruary Ann: 1649
Thomas Bliss was borne in March An 1651
Deliuer Bliss was borne in Agust An 1655
Samuell Bliss was borne in Desemb Ano 1657
Anne Bliss was borne in Septem Ano 1660
Rebeckah Bliss was borne in March An 1663
Source: Vital Records of Norwich Connecticut, 1659-1848. (Online
database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical
Society, 2007.) Originally published as: Vital Records of Norwich,
1659-1848. Hartford, Society of colonial wars in the state of
Connecticut, 1913.
[Note: Some letters transcribed in the above record as F probably
should have been transcribed as S (letters S's at the time often
appearing a long F-like letters). So, for example, "poft" is actually
"post," "Defember" is actually "Desember" or December, and "Jerufha"
is actually "Jerusha." MB]
Vital Records of Saybrook
The marriage of Robert Chapman and birth of his Children
Mar[r]ied at Seabrook to Ann bliss the 29 of Aprill Anno 1642
John Chapman born the beginning of July Anno [16]44
Robert Chapman born the middle of Sept. Anno [16] 46
Anna Chapman born about the 12th Sept. Anno [16]48 deseased the above
at same time the year following
Hanna Chapman born the 4th of October Anno [16]50
Nathanill Chapman born the 16 of February Anno [16]53
Mary Chapman born the 15 of Aprill Anno [16]55
Sarah Chapman born the 25 of Sept Anno [16]57
Anne Chapman the wife of Capt Rob[ert] Chapman deceased the 20th of
November Anno 1685
Source: Vital Records of Saybrook 1647-1834 (Online Database:
AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society,
2008), (Originally published as: Vital Records of Saybrook 1647-1834.
Hartford, The Connecticut Historical Society and the Connecticut
Society of the Order of the Founders and Patriots of America, 1952.)
Connecticut Town Marriage Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection)
Name: Thomas Bliss
Marriage Date: Oct 1644
Marriage Place: Saybrook, Connecticut, USA
Spouse: Elizabeth [Text: "Thomas, m. Elizabeth [ ], Oct. latter end,
1644"]
Name: Robert Chapman
Marriage Date: 29 Apr 1642
Marriage Place: Saybrook, Connecticut, USA
Spouse: Ann Blith
Name: Mary Bliss
[Mary Bles]
Marriage Date: 26 Nov 1646
Marriage Place: Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Spouse: Joseph Parsons
Source: Ancestry.com. Connecticut, Town Marriage Records, pre-1870
(Barbour Collection) [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com
Operations Inc, 2006. Original data: White, Lorraine Cook, ed. The
Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55.
Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1994-2002.
Connecticut Town Death Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection)
Name: Ann Chapman
Death Date: 20 Nov 1685
Death Place: Saybrook, Connecticut, USA
Spouse: Capt. Robert
Name: Capt. Robert Chapman
Death Date: 13 Oct 1687
Death Place: Saybrook, Connecticut, USA
Source: Ancestry.com. Connecticut Town Death Records, pre-1870
(Barbour Collection) [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com
Operations Inc, 2006. Original data: White, Lorraine Cook, ed. The
Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55.
Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1994-2002.
New England Marriages Prior to 1700
Bliss, Thomas & Elizabeth [?Birchard]; latter end of Oct 1644;
Norwich, CT/Saybrook
Source: Ancestry.com. U.S., New England Marriages Prior to 1700
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2012.
Original data: Torry, Clarence A. New England Marriages Prior to
1700. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2004.
Connecticut Deaths and Burials Index
Name: Thomas Bliss
Death Date: 15 Apr 1688
Death Place: Connecticut
Burial Place: Norwich, Connecticut
Gender: Male
FHL Film Number: 3091
Source: Ancestry.com. Connecticut, Deaths and Burials Index, 1650-1934
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.,
2011. Original data: "Connecticut Deaths and Burials, 1772–1934."
Index. FamilySearch, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2009, 2010. Index entries
derived from digital copies of original and compiled records.
Massachusetts Applications of Freemen
Name: Joseph Parsons
Date: 19 May 1669
Original Source: C. R., Vol. IV. p. 629.
Comment: Took oath
Source: Ancestry.com. Massachusetts Applications of Freemen, 1630-91
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2000.
Original data: Paige, Lucius R.. List of Freemen of Massachusetts.
Boston, MA, USA: New England Historical and Genealogical Society,
1849.
Autobiographical Letter of Robert Chapman of Saybrook, Connecticut
Capt Robert Chapmans Legacie to his Children. Left to them in writing
before his decease who departed this Life the 13th day of October 1687
To leave Something with my Children that may be of use to them whilst
they are passing through a perilous world the design of this writing
The first Part of my time till I was about 15 or 16 years of age I
lived with my parents I was Educated in the way they then called
puretansme in observance of gospell rules and especially of the Sabath
which [ ] no Little tryall to me to see
[ ] others of neighbors around about me to have their
plays and Sports on the Sabbath and my Self held in by the rains of
family Government to the dutys of the Sabbath:
When I was about 15 years of age I had a mind to be put out to Learn a
trade great care was taken to Place me in Some Godly famaly and
because there was not of that trade then known near my fathers house I
was bound out to a man that Lived about 30 miles off who in a formall
Shew had the name of [ ] Christian but in truth and real[ ] a poor
man. when I had been there a while I had my Liberty as other boys had
to play on the Sabbath days and improved my Liberty Some time till the
Lord was pleased to make me to remember the way of Education at home
and how just it was with God to Leave me now to have my [ ] to be vain
and profain as others by the Good hand of God upon me it So prevented
that I left of that course and attended the [ ] as well as
I Could Remember Children be not wanting to your children when they
are young begin betimes to teach them the knowlege of the god of their
fathers you will finde the first of time to be the Best of time: and
though not much Encouragement may at present appear yet be assured
there is a blessing anexed thereto that Shall in due time appear :
After I had Somtime refrained my Self from those Sabath daye Sports
Providentially there was a Scotch Minister who traviling through The
town on the Last day of the week was persuaded by Some Christians to
Stay in town and preach to them on the morrow which was the Sabbath:
which he yielded unto and did preach from those words : put you on the
Lord Jesus Christ : which words was in the opening and prosecution
Such words as I thought I never heard before as to inward Soul
Concernments and this did give a Second lift to me : After Some years
Service with my master the way was opened for me as that I Returned
home to my fathers house then was the great name and fame of new:
England Sounding about the Country: then Also liberty and Sports upon
the Sabath publickly allowed then. Great numbers appeared to Embrace
the Same and make a scoff at those that would not fall in with them :
then the signs of a black and dark time did appear inso much that it
Caused Great thoughts of heart amongst the Godly what was their way
whether to go for new: England there being then an open door Some
chose to keep their Standing and others to great numbers from all
parts of England of all Sorts of persons with their familys cast them
Selves upon the providence of God by Shiping themselves for new
England in which time it being the year 1635 : I wrought Jorney
[ ] work with one Tillinghust for the Space of half a year
and until I Came for new: England a blessed change it was to me to
fall into such a Godly family where I had my desire of Christian
Comunion and so as that I grew apace in Knowledge and Stability with
Such warmed affections as that I thought my Estate was Good but my
purpose for Newengland being setled and the time drawing near of
taking Ship after I had Spent Some time in visiting my friends in Kent
and Sussex in the beginning of September was dismissed from them to
the blessing of God and tooke Ship and after a long and dangerous
voyage arrive at Boston in new England the 26 day of December 1635 and
my Self with Several others lovingly Entertained on Shore and had our
entertainment that winter at Govenour winthrops farm : When I had been
Some time on Shore I had a Great fit of sickness and many terrors with
it as Concerning my Estate : could make no Comfortable work of what I
had thought I had been wrought in me before but many discouragments
and heart mis-givings that Surely here must be Something more done
then yet I had found: the Lord was pleased to raise me up again and
from thence brought me to this place in the beginning of April 1636
where I have remained to this day after
After I had been here Some time that black and dark day of the pequod
war fell upon us in such Sort that our lives were in hazard night and
day and when we Saw one taken away one day 2 at another 4 at another
out of our little number and the Enemy rage and insult that he will
have us all : now comes home two questions what do I hear :and what
must I do here : here after much Strugling I was Satisfied in that
that I was in the Place that God had Set me in that I did not bring my
Self into it no further then I was advised by my friends Especially by
my faithful Loving mother who I know did lay up a Stock of prayers for
me Remember this Children your obediance to parents may Stand by you
when you have Little Else to relieve you 2dly what must I do here the
voice of God to me both in his word and works was prepare thy Self the
son of man Comes in an hour when you look not for him Saw it So by
others and to help on this Great work the Lord was pleased to Send mr.
Higginson amongst us to be preacher unto us whose labour in the work
of the ministry was Suitable Seasonable profitable according to the
then present Dispensation of providence all which to gether put me
upon more earnest indeavours then formerly by prayer hearing and
laying up the word Studying the Scriptures acquainting my Self with
the principles of the oracles of God unto which all truths may be
refered and have found the benefit of that Study even to keep me Stedy
from being deceived by the cunning and Subtle contrivances of Such as
would be accounted to be angels of Light and yet in truth are the
children of darkness who can cry up the Scriptures with great zeal and
Solemnity even those that favour the lu[st?] of their hearts and
others will Slight for this my time hath been a perilous age when So
many false Christs hath appeared in the world to deceive Some they
must have Imediate Revelations from heaven or else of no value others
do affirm that though the Spirit doth witness according to the word
yet without any condition or qualification wrought in us : another
Sort are those that Say there is nothing required of them but to
believe that Christ hath done all for them and therefore neither
Repent or obey the Gospel in the Sumery part thereof
another Sort and they are such as have gone creeping up and down the
Country to gain Disciples who have and do teach that the Light that is
in a person if it be tended to is sufficient to Salvataion : these
with Some others of Like import pass hard under Soaking awakenings to
be Embrased as to bring rest to the Soul which through divine
assistance upon tryall I found them to lead off from Christ and so
from rest for as much As they all have a tendancy to Cast off Christs
yoak and therefore far off from bearing his Cross the nescesity of
which is So often urged by Christ himself otherwise we cannot be his
disciples his being prest hard upon me and the Sweetness of Communion
with christ that I found in private prayer brought me up to a Settled
resolution to be for Christ to Stand for christ to take up his Cross
and follow him in what capacity he Should bring me into which
resolution I have found to abide and be helpfull to me Especially when
I have Seen the cross coming to me and waies before me to Escape the
Same o then do not deny Christ hath Said that voice within me blessed
by God that hath been my helper that in those criticall times and
turns I have met withall that I have not imprisoned the truth when it
hath come to my turn neither wickedly departed from my God : my
children I insist the more? here for this is foundatition work it
being laid upon Christ Christ as a crucified Christ: Christ As he is
revealed in the Gospel Not coming with outwarn observation but with
inward demonstration of the word and spirit of Christ thus lay your
foundation and the building will Stand and in all matters you are
called forth to attend Let your business be with God what Shall I do
in this and that case, do not Confer with flesh and blood but Study
the Good word of God be proving what is the good and acceptable will
of the Lord and keep close there to although you See the cross make
make fast toward you flinch not for in due time you Shall reap if you
faint not but Especially See that your foundation be laid upon Christ
the discovery of his Love and rich Grace for this will allways be of a
constraining nature to follow Christ. We Love him because he loved us
first Gracious discovery begets love and love resolution as Some times
he Said Should Such aman a I flee according to the Discoveries of free
Grace So will be Our love : according to our love So Our resolution
for God ye Scripture is Plentifull in this 116 psam : I will love the
Lord and the reason was because he had heard his Supplication and
inclined his ear : but when was that when the Sorrows of Death
compassed me about and the pains of hell gat hold upon him as if david
Should Say oh here is matchles love indeed when death and hell come
together even then for God to hear and then to deliver this hath
begotten love in my Soul therefore hath thy Servant found in his heart
to pray oh Says he I love the Lord and will call upon him so long as I
live Children look to your your Selves : on this account Strong
resolutions for God Speake out Gracious discoverys of God : weak
resolutions argues weak work and no resolution Seems to render a
person as having yet his choice to make Standing upon an Indifferent
point with god it is that wich which Some times you know I have hinted
at when persons have been presented as fit for church comunion and to
be enroled amongst the Saints they have Spoken Some more and Some less
according to what God hath done for them but very little if anything
at all what they will do for god which Seems to fall Short of all the
examples both Christ himself and of the most Eminant of Saints and is
a mongst many others arguments an argument of declention and of
pitifull low Spirits when Christ was asked whether he were a King Says
Christ to this and was I born and for this Cause came I Into the world
So Paul I go bound in the spirit to Jerusalem : I have Sworn Says
David and will perform that I will keep thy righteous Judgments : See
therefore what resolution and purpose of heart you are come to for as
a man thinketh in his heart So is he the times coming on do call for
Settlement See your foundations be Safe: I have Insisted the more upon
this because Scripture and experience Lays So much weight thereon the
church of Ephesus haveing fallen is commanded for her recovery to
repent recover her first love and do her first works : I Shall now
Come to Give Some hints Concerning the Building upon this foundation
that is a Spirituall building, as the foundation is So must the
building be :
First then Remember that in this building there must be an agreement
with the foundation in all the causes’ thereof the Eficient
meritorious formall and finall causes : first the Eficient which is
the Spirit of God without which you cannot Strike a Stroke to the
building aright : we know not how to pray as we ought but the Spirit
helpeth our in firmities it is not Grace received in the habit that
will do but the operation is of the Spirit
Secondly you must agree with the meritorious cause and that is the
righteousness of Christ that there is any good look from heaven upon a
Sinfull Soul is the purchase of Christ : away then with that Self
conceited righteousness of our own and feel and Say when we have done
all we can we are unprofitable Servants
Thirdly we must agree as to the formal cause faith in God and
observance to God a believing hart and a Godly life you are no more
Strangers and forainers Says Paul but fellow citizens with the Saints
and of the household of God and are built upon the foundation of the
Apostles and prophets Jesus Christ Himself being the Chief corner
Stone
fourthly: you must agree with the foundation as to the finall cause
which is to build a Spirituall and So an Eternall house and hence this
building is called a building of God an house not made with hands
Eternal in the heavens : now where-Ever there is this foundation laid
upon Christ there is a growing Spirituall building there upon which
Shall grow So high as to reach into heaven and there remain a holy
temple through the Spirit unto the lord notwith Standing all the
powers of darkness and the gates of hell that Shall not prevaile
Fifthly that the guilding and the foundation may agree whatever you do
Labour to keep up uprightness to God and to man a citizen of Sion is
one that Speaks the truth in his heart : his heart and his tongue doth
Sweetly agree then this Spirituall building Spiritual building and
foundation will agree also there is nothing that the Devill and his
Instruments do more Set themselves against then the uprightness of the
Saints and it is rare if one day pass but that a discerning Spirituall
builder may See Subtile and crafty and many times undiscerned working
of Sin Satan and the world to drive aman off from his up-rightness
which if they can attain that they know the man is conquered and Like
to have his portion with hippocrites
Now to leave with you my Children Some of my observations and
experiences in my time of Snares and dificulties that I have been
brought into and helped thereon
First I have often met with 2 ways the one a way of uprightness with
the Cross, the other away of falshood wth worldly advantage I have
Chosen the first
Secondly : I have met with 2 Sorts of persons Saints and Sinners : by
Saints I mean Such who are called faithfull and true and are like
minded unto Christ : by Siners I mean garnished profesors and yet Like
minded with the world rising high in forms and outward Shews of
holiness but as deeply bespoted with the filth of this world as
others. were were there visard taken off I have loved the first and
been Shy of the Second try me o God and know my heart try me and know
my thoughts and See if there be any wicked way in me and Lead me in
the way Everlasting
Thirdly I have met with temptations both from Saints and Siners who
have delt Injuriously with me and ungratfully to have revenged my Self
which I have had oppertunity to do : but the lord hath Said vengance
is mine and I will repay believing that it Shall So be: have quieted
my Self and been Still :
fourthly : I have met with temptations on worldly preferments to
conform to the Customs of the changing times it being the way to get
up and hold out in honourable Employments but the Snares and
temptations that ly thick and Strong in such capacities have been
fearfull to me I have not to my Knowledge used any indirect means for
Such attainments lest the temptations Should be too hard for me and a
trembling thing to me when God hath Called me forth upon the Stage of
action
Fifthly I have Seen the time when it was Joy to me to do that which
was right and have indeavoured to do So to mine enemies as well as
friends: of Spiritual and Soul concerns in these particulars
First I have Seen the time when Secret communion with Christ Christ
hath been Esteemed by me as the most precious time in this world
Secondly I have Seen the time that I have longed for the Sabbath
before it came and when come Esteemed them honourable and holy unto
the Lord
Thirdly I have heard and recieved the word many a time with this
prayer lord make this word Good to thy Servant:
Fourthly : I have found a Difference in the Solemnity and awfullness
of my heart betwixt the reading of the pure word of God and other mens
works there from
fifthly I have found great benifit in the comunion of Saints Specially
in those days when Spiritual Experimentall things were brought forth:
that which comes from the heart usually reaches the heart:
Sixthly: I have thorow the Grace of god in dificult Cases which were
beyond me been able to Commit my Self in the Sense of my own
insifficientcy into the hands of him who is alsufficient and have had
the accomplishment of that promise both in doing and suffering my
Grace Shall be sufficient for thee
Secondly The change of times in my time acording to my observation may
not be unusefull to you if my time be divided into 3 parts I lived
almost a 3rd part in England before I Came into these Parts : that was
a declining time as to the life and power of religion few there were
in most places and Great places too that kept up religion in their
families and things grew worse and worse: profanation of the Sabaths
allowed by the prelates bowing the bodys of the congregation when the
name of Jesus was mentioned with Severall other Injunctons to the
Subverting of Souls : te Godly of the land grieved and not being able
to help them Selves the others discouraged So as they were Seen to
walk on Every Side : then a time to make that prayer help Lord for the
Godly man ceaseth and the faithfull fail from among the children of
men this I Saw in my first part of time in England and it was an Evil
time that the Shadows of the Evening were Streched over the people of
God
A Second change of time in my time was in the morning of new England I
may Say the first 20 years and it was a rising time glorious things
were then reported of our Sion newenglands morning clear and
beautifull though not altogether without clouds of herisie which
acationed trouble but yet Soon crushed the persons being found no
better then then wandring Stars and their doctrins Like Empty clouds
without water them had the Churches rest in New England and were
Edified walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the holy
ghost were multiplyed then was the glory of our first temple such as
its doubtfull whether Ever it will be recovered to : then were the
churches organised with teaching Elders [Ruleing] Elders deacons all
fixed in their places then were there to be found in the Churches men
able pious men who could and did in the absence of their officers
instruct the people out of the Scriptures to their edification and
good sattisfaction then there were Signal testimonies of God hearing
the prayers of his people with Speedy answers there unto then God
rebuking kings for the Sake of his people he broak their laws and cut
their Spears assunder Saying be still and know that I am God I will be
exalted among the heathen
The Last 3d part of my time or there abouts nigh 20 years according to
my observation hath been a declining time from those first ways as in
general all or the most part do grant that after God hath done So well
by us we have Iesuran like waxed fat & kicked the heel and
therefore have all those Evils come upon and over taken us : and that
Seem to Increase upon us one year after another as if the Lord were
resolved not only to make us Sick with Smiting but to give us a deadly
wound that Shall not be healed : I Shall leave with you my Children
Some perticulars of my observation and who wee may be compared unto
Surely in our first days to Capernaum lifted up to heaven and in our
last days with those in malachies time inclineing downward towards
hell :
The first Sign of declention is loss of love and affection to God and
his ways Saith Christ to the Church of Ephesus thou hast left thy
first love their declention first begins in cooling the affections and
then diverting the judgement and practice So Say they the table of the
Lord is poluted and his meate is contemptable as if they should Say it
is poor beggerly living upon the provision God hath provided in his
house, oh how many have there been in Churches who have for a
considerable time well approved the doctrine of of the Gospel and
discipline of the Churches and yet afterward Shews themselves to be
men and wo -men of other perswations : Great families that when their
Children have been grown up they have Studyed more their privilegges
then their duties : and the first ways of the Churches are strict
there need not be So much adoe all the Congregation is holy and hence
implicite faith must Suffice when allas poor Souls the fault lies not
there but in themselves : they have nothing to Say they have lost
their love and affection to the word and ways of God and have not
concern ed themselves as they ought and there fore willingly ignorant
of those plain truths of the Gospel that with the heart man belives
unto righteousness and with the mouth Confession is made unto
Salvation So clear and full are those things laid down in the word
that a Single eye may See them:
A Second Signe of declention and That is Idleness : if a person loose
His love and afecition to a thing he will Secretly grow careless of it
: there was a time when heads of families kept up the worship of God
in their families but after their Children were Grown up they grew
more lax forgeting their places and loosing the ways of their
Government taking little notice of their Extravagences if they please
them on worldly accounts So that the Spirit of Religion hath Secretly
and In- Sensably died away in those Families a lamentale thing to See
Great families of chidren come to man and womans Estate and yet no
more to be found in them then in those that are of the Profainer Sort
as Either to the form and power of Godlyness yet these idle persons do
think themselves wronged if they be not raised up to (part missing
here) that height of priviledges as others these are they that will
not Shut the door of the house of God for nought neither kindle a fire
up on his alter without Some worldly advantage: I have no pleasure in
you Saith the Lord of hoasts neither will I except an offering at your
hand :
A third Signe of declention is when persons grow teachy and froward a
laysy person doth not care for work quckly weary and looks at that
little he doth to be great either as to the mater manner or end the
Sluggard is more wise in his own conceit then Seven men that can
render a rea -Son, are not all places filled with these Sorts of
persons who are So far from the knowledge of true godliness that if
(part missing here) you tell them friend or brother here is a defect
in you in this and the other thing, presently he is tuchy and will
Snuff at it and it may be So weary of it that they will proceed to
hatred So as to lay a Snare for those that advise or reprove them A
fourth Signe is when persons Grow obstinate and bold it is not the
usuall Jeniss of a true believer to grow obstinate and bold for that
there is laid in the hearts of Such the fear of God and thus the
blessed man that feareth all way he is so well acquainted with himself
that when he comes to be delt withall he quickly hath misgivings that
doth arise in him, it is your formall and obstinate persons that will
Stout ? it out both against God and man so in malachi your words have
been Stout against me Saith the Lord, yet ye Say what have wee Spoken
So much against thee: ye have Said it is in vain to Serve god and what
profit is it that we have kept his ordinances I wish that this be not
one of the great Sins of Newengland when professors after Some time of
Experience attending to gods ordinances as also to the proffits and
incomes of the world which as thorny things growing together with the
Seed of the word untill it be choaked & the poor Soul come at last
to Say I find no profit in ordinances by them its time Spent without
profit and there fore I am weary of it as they Say here in malachi
what a weariness is it The fifth Signe of apostacy or declention that
wee may finde in Malachis time was that they lost their Spirituall
discerning they could not discern between the precious and the vile:
ye have wearied the Lord when you Say Everyone that doth evill is Good
in the Sight of the Lord, and now Say they we call the proud happy and
they that work wickedness are Set up : yea they that tempt god are
Even delivered if the State and case of New England be like this :
all you that fear the Lord Look about you First look out and See where
you may find out those that truly fear God : thus the godly did in
that time.
Secondly Make much of their. Company then they that feared the Lord
Spake often one to another : Let your visits with them be frequent and
delightfull on to acount of the name of God
Thirdly beware of all others on the account of the name of God for th
think but little of it : and when they doe, its not to advance but to
Emp or Slyly one way or other to cast reflection there upon as they
where is the God of judgment
And now my children for whom principally take these pains think on
what I Say Especially So far as I Speak according to the Lord and
Testament : I am now taking my leave of you : and you will See me no
more I Shall Leave you in an evill declining world and periolous the
Simtoms where of grows on a pace that an upright man Shall have hard
work to find out So as he may commit himself to the faithfullness of
any Saving the Lord alone : See that I Jeremy therefore Stir up your
Selves and one another Take heed you loose not the Things you have
wrought It is a Great refreshment to me how writing that the lord in
rich grace hath brought you all into visible covenant with himself and
none of you fall amongst the number of those sticklers who in their
times and turns have been So hurtfull to the purity power and peace of
the churches : but according as you have been instructed So you have
received and as [you] have received So you have practiced the good
lord Strengthen Establish and confirm you all unto the end that you
may hold fast what you have gained and keep on being abundant in the
work of the lord for as much as ye know your Labour Shall not be in
vaine in the Lord that when he shall ap- pear we may appear with him
in glory not as parents and Children but as the Children of the living
God to whom be all praise honour might majesty and Dominion world
without End
from your truely Loving
father whilst I am :
Robert Chapman
Senior
September the 6th 1687
Source: Original letter located at R. Stanton Avery Collection, New
England Historic Genealogical Society.
See Halseth, Judith H., "Autobiographical Letter of Robert1 Chapman
of Saybrook, Connecticut," New England Historic and Genealogical
Register, vol. 159, 2005, p. 316 for more information.
Sketches of the Judicial History of Massachusetts from 1630 to the
Revolution in 1775
"At a Court holden at Springfield, Sept. 27, 1659 Samuel Allen of
Northampton, plaintiff vs. John Bliss of the same town defendant, in
an action of the case for unjustly stealing away the affections of
Hannah Woodford, his espoused wife damnifying the said Samuel to the
value of £50. In this cause the plaintiff withdrew his action before
the case was tried for that he found himself defective in his
testimony."
Source: Washburn, Emory, Sketches of the Judicial History of
Massachusetts from 1630 to the Revolution in 1775, C.C. Little
and J. Brown, 1840, pgs. 62-63.
Salem Witches and Others Tried for Witchcraft
Name of Accused: Mary Parsons
Year: 1651
Town: Springfield
Colony: Massachusetts
Outcome: Acquitted
Name of Accused: Mary Parsons
[Mary Bliss]
[Mary Bliss Parsons]
Year: 1674-75
Town: Northampton
Colony: Massachusetts
Outcome: Acquitted
Source: Ancestry.com. New England, Salem Witches and Others Tried for
Witchcraft, 1647-1697 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com
Operations Inc, 2000. Original data: Original information from
surviving legal records from the towns and villages in question and
appearing in Godbeer, Richard, comp. The Devil's Dominion: Magic
and Religion in Early New England: Appendices A & B.
[Information taken from Boyer, Paul and Stephen Nissenbaum, eds. The
Salem Witchcraft Papers: Verbatim Transcripts of the Legal Documents
of the Salem Witchcraft Outbreak. 3 vols. New York, NY: 1977.). New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Court Records from The Goody Parsons Educational Web Site
Court Proceedings
Mary Parsones the wife of Joseph Parsones Senor Appeared alsoe Samll
Bartlett whome this Corte ordered to produce ye witnes=ses in yt
matter refferring to Goodwife Parsones suspicion of witchcraft. And ye
sayd Goodwife Parsones being called to speak for her self, she did
assert her own inocency, often mentioning it how cleare she was of
such a Crime, and yt the Righteous God knew her Inocency with whome
she had left her cause Whereas Robert Old was ordered to appeare at
this Corte, But not being warned, the Corte have now left yt case to
ye worshipfull Major Pynchon to Deale in yt Case as her sees meete
according to law There having beene many suspiciones of witchcrafft at
Northampton & severall testemonyes concerning the same, of
Persones suspected, exhibited to the Last County Corte in Sept last at
Springfeild by Persones then & there comeing voluntarlie some to
give in Evedence & others there appearing also without summondes
to cleare themselves of for execrablle a Crime, Alsoe James Bridgeman
sending to ye Corte yt Diligent inquesition might be made Concerning
the death of his Daughter, Samll Bartlets wife, whome both Goodman
Bridgeman & Samll Bartlet suspect she came to her end by some
unatureall meanes & for yt Diverse testemoneys reflect upon Mary
Parsons ye wife of Joseph Parsons Senor it being alsoe affirmed yt
there were many more wittnesseses yt would come in & in yt Case,
the Corte then thought meete to order Mary Par==sones to appeare at ye
Corte now hither ajourned, who accordingly appeareing as above sayd,
Alsoe Samll Bartlett appeared, whome ye Corte ordered to Produce ye
testmonyes in ye Case, which being Brought in & ye Corte ffinding
them many & various, some of ym being demonstrations of witch
Craft & others sorely reflecting upon Mary Parsons as being Guilty
that way though ye tryall of ye Case belongs not to this Corte, but to
ye Corte of Assistants, yet Consedering ye Remoteness and ye season of
ye yeare & many Difficultyes if not in capeabilityes o Persones
there to appeare some being soe wrake, this Corte tooke ye more paines
in inquiring into ye Case, Appointed a jury of Sober dazed [?], chast
woman to make Diligent search upon ye Body of mary Parsones, wheather
any markes of witchcraft might appeare, who gave in there account to
ye Corte on oath of wt they found (which) with all ye testemoneys in
ye Case ye Corte orders to be sent to Boston to our Honored Governor
by ye ffirst oppertuntie, Leaveing it to his Wisidom & Prudence in
Comumicateing ye matter to ye Honored Magestrates for ye ffurther
Proceeding therein as they shall see cause And ye Recorder of this
Corte is accordingly to take Care yt all ye write ings & evedences
in ye Case be ready & Delivered to ye worshipfull Major Pynchon
who is desired to write to ye Governor concerning this matter.
Bond for Mary Parsons to Appear at Court
Itt is ffurther ordered yt Mary Parsones shall make her appeareance
Before ye Governor magestrates or Corte of Assistantes to answer to wt
she is suspected of in Case she be called or required theretoo by
Authority & her Husband Joseph Parsones to become Bound in a Band
of 50 [?] for his wives appearance accordingly it required before ye
13th May next And accordingly Joseph Parsons Senor being sent for
& comeing before this Corte acknowledged himself Bound to ye
County Tresurer for Hampshire in ye Sum of fifty Poundes Sterling that
his wife Mary Parsones, if required thereto shall appeare at Boston,
Before ye Governor Magistrates or Corte of Assistantes or any Corte
between this & ye 13th May next, to Answer unto wt she is
suspected off viz: witchcraft, and in Case of her non appearance
accordingly upon lawfull sumons theretoe, Being sent to or left at ye
House of ye sayd Joseph Parsons then the sayd Joseph Parsones is to
forfeite ye sum of fifty Poundes aforesayd to ye County Treasurer for
ye use of ye County, this ye sayd Joseph Parsones Acknowledged in
Corte whereupon his wife was Discharged ffurther attendance at Present
Robert Bartlett testifies about Rumors heard from George Lanton
June 10 [16]56
Robbard Bartlett testifieth that Gorg Lanton tould him the last winter
that Goody Bridgman and Goody Branch were speaking about mary parsons
concerning her being a which and the said George tould to the said
Robbard that my wife being there, said she could not think it &
the said Goody Bridgman seemd to be distasted with us also they had
hard thought of the wife of the said Robbard be cause she was intimat
with the said mary parson
Taken uppon oth in the presence of us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Hannah Lanton verifies Robert Bartlett's Testimony
Hanna Lanton the wife of Georg Lanton testifieth to the truth of this
of Robbard Bartlett and saith it is the very truth in the presence of
us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Margaret Bliss Testifies about Sara Bridgeman's Gossip
Margarett Bliss testifieth that Sara Bridgman tould her that she did
heare that her daughter parsons was susspected to be a which and that
she had heard there was some discontent betweene the blind man at
Springfeild and her daughter & that she had done him hurtte and
that there was some words between the blind man & her daughter and
then the child of the blind man had asounding fitte
June 20 [16]56 testified uppon oth before us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Hanna Lanton testifies about what Sara Bridgeman told her about her
child's illness
June 20 [16]56
Hanna Lanton the wife of Gorg Lanton testifieth that Sara Bridgman the
wife of Joams Bridgman tould her that her boy when his knee was sore
cried out of the wife of Joseph parsons and said that she did hurt him
and that she would pull of his knee and also the said Sara tould her
that she had heard other say them where Jealous that the wife of
Joseph parsons was not right and the said Hanna saith that by reason
thereof she had some found of the wife of Joseph parson but it hath
pleased god to help her over them & doth believe there was noo
such cause and is sorry she should have hard thought of her uppon noe
better grounds testified uppon oth in the presence of us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Sara Bridgeman testifies about her son's illness and talk against
Mary Parsons
Sara Bridgman owned before us that she tould Hanna Lanton that her
boy cried out of the wife of Joseph parsons & said she would hurt
him & that she would pull of his knee and that she had heard
others say that there where Jealousies of Goody parsons that she was
not right
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Hanna Broughton testifies about Sara Bridgeman's Gossip
June 20 [16]–56
Hanna Broughton saith that Sara Bridgman the wife of Joams Bridgman
said to her that Mr Pinchon should say that if that where true which
he had heard Goody parson could not be right & the said Sara said
if she is such a one she desiered god to keep her & hers from
having any think to doe with her and the said Hanna saith she did
somteime it go about without
testified uppon oth before us Sara Bridgman owned before us that she
tould hanna broughton as above testified
william houlton
Tho Bascum
John Webb and Hanna Broughton testifiy about Sara Bridgeman
John Webb hanna Broughton testifieth uppon oth that Sara Bridgman
being summond about last June before the three men at Northampton
desputed by the Honnorabl corte the for the triall of small cases they
then desired to speake with her boy that had his knee sore the said
Sara said that her boy should not com
August 15 [16]56
in the presence of us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Testimony about Various Rumors
There was tendered to Goodman Parsons and his wife refferences aboute
ye businesse by James Bridgman in ye presense of
Samuel Wright Senior.
and William Joanes.
and refference tendered ye second time in the presence of Samuel
Wright Senior Richard Lyman . William Joanes John Webb and shee
refused it and her answer was what ye corte would give her that shee
would stand to
George Langtons Testimony what he spake to Goodma Bartlet at a time
when his wife Goodwife Bridgman and Goodwife Branch was together they
thought shee was Goodwife Parsons was naught & was not right and
this I told to Goodman Bartlet this George Langton can affirm by oath.
Goodwife Wright Testifies about Mary Parsons
The testimony of Goodwife Wright ye wife of Sam: Wrigth Junior
Goodwife Wright said that when shee was at Goody Parsons house shee
told her that Goodwife Holton said shee would make her candles for her
and halfe for ye other Goodman Webb and his wife doth affirmd the same
yt Goodwife Parsons said soe to them. Goodwife Holton was spoken to
about this business in the presense of John Webb and his wife and
denied it and said yt shee never spoak word with Goodwife Parsons
about it Richard Lyman doth affirmd ye same as Goodwife Holton denyde
it . . soe yt its a madd ly of Goodwife Parsons.
Richard Lyman and John Web testify about Mary Parsons
Richard Lyman and John Webb affirmed that at yt time when Goodman
Elmore was swor=ing some witnesses concerning Goodwife Bridgman
businesses : Goodman Elmore urged them to Sward [swear] and telling of
som what bthey should say and did contrue the meaning of there words
and writt downe what he thought good ; and when he read it the
witnesses denyed what he writt.
John Webb testifies about Mary Parsons
John Webb affirmde that Goodman Elmord said upon a time whoe he was
examining somethying deppending upon this business of Goodwife –
Bridgmans, yt he stood for them and would stand for them meaning
Goodwife Parsons
Testimony of William Hannum's Wife and Testimony of William Hannum
Testimonyes taken on the behalf of Sarah the wife of James Bridgman
the 11th Day ove August 1656
the wife of William Hannum of Northwottuck at Northampton sayth that I
have been warned by some of Windsor and some of Norwottuck to beware
how I had to doe with Mary the wife of Joseph Parsons : and she
herself also told me, when she lay in of her last child, and being ill
in a strange fitt, that the occasion of her illness was, that her
mother being lately there, had brought her news that she the said Mary
was suspected to be a witch: the said Goodwife Hannum also sayth that
this winter past I spun for the said Mary Parsons about 33 runn of
yarn, & this Spring the said Mary desired me to lett her have one
of my daughters to dwell with her, and I considering wt rumores went
about of her I was loth to let her go there to dwell: but shee havinge
allured my daughter, as my daughter told me, I told my daughter shee
should not goe thither to dwell; if shee might have ten pound a yeare:
at this tyme the said Mary Parsons came to me & challenged me
about the yarne yt I spun for her, that it wanted of the tale of the
threads in the Knotts, uppon wch I went to her house & examined
the yarn, and all that I examined did want almost in every knott of
the yarn, some tymes there would be but 18 threads in a knott for 40
or 28 for 40 wch notwithstanding wn I spun it, I did my best endeavd
to give a true account of & it was not found fault with till this
tyme : & for I spun some more for her to recompence this defect
& I spunn more for her besides that, & still when the yarn
came to her, it would never hold out tale in the threads, though I did
my best endeavr to deale truly in ye thing, and I have spun for others
& could have my yarn hold out After this I spun oakum yarn for
her, & sent for her weights to weigh it & called whom I had
about mee to see yt I made weight & soe I sent it home to her
& Presently shee sent me word it wanted weight Shee the said
Goodwife Hanum also saith that my daughter though formerly healthy,
yett this summer hath been very sickly & unhelpful to mee, wch
though I know it may be by Gods owne immediate hand : yet it causeth
some jealousies in me against the said Mary, because it fell out with
in 3 or 4 days after I hadgiven her a full denyal of my Daughters
service Testified on oath before me Elizur Holyoke
William Hannum [blott out?] testifyeth on oath that I have had some
jealousyes against this Mary Parsons, on these grounds: First this
Mary came to my house about the yarn that shee missed and then wee had
a falling out about it & some discontented words passed on both
sides: this was in an eveninge, & as I take it in March last &
that eveninge all my Cattell were well for ought I could see by them,
& the next morning One cow lay in my yard, ready to dy as I
thought: wch when I had considered I endeavored to gett her up &
at length gott her to stand: but shee languished away & dyed about
a fortnight after, though I took great care night & day to save
her, givinge her samp pease wholesome drinks eggs etc. & this Cow
beinge young was lusty before this very tyme Secondly, the same week I
remember I beinge at work at John Webbs, I saw Joseph Parsons beatinge
one of his little children, for loosinge its shoo; and to my
apprehension he beat it unmercifully, & his wife comeinge to save
it, because shee had beaten it before as shee said, he thrust her
away: the next day I gooinge to work agayne at John Webbs, there were
some other neighbors there and they were talkinge how Joseph Parsons
had in a sort beaten his wife : then I answered them that one of you
benige his next neighbors must ride, wch manner of jestinge I doe not
approove at all or allow of in my selfe : the same day the said Mary
Parsons hearing how I had jested shee dealt with mee about it showinge
her offense : & so it fell out that the same evennige, I havenige
a sow it had 4 young piggs the sow was missing & we could not fynd
her that night, the next mornnige very early I sought her a good while
but I found her not, but meeting a neighbor he asked mee wt I sought I
said, my sow : Says hee yonder in the swamp is a sow I think it is
yors I went thither & it was my sow : & there shee stood wth
her nose to ye ground looking steadily as if shee had seen something
in the ground : Soe I drove her home & before noon yt day shee
dyed. Shee till now was a lusty swine & well fleshed
Thirdly I haveinge two oxen I lent them to John Bliss who is thy Mary
Parsons brother & I was to have his oxen to work agayn for them :
& for my oxen & his & Goodman Lanctons I sett out to break
up some ground & they putt John Bliss his oxen in the Middle for
they were young and not very fitt to goe behind much less before :
about wch tyme Mary Parsons came to mee & did chide wth mee for
abusing her brothers oxen I told her I did not abuse them : shee said
you putt them in the middle where they are always under the whip, I
told her they were not any way wronged by ys : & shee went away in
anger : within 3 days after I was gonige to Windsor wth my oxen &
cart : & about 4 mile from our town, as I was goinge whether my Ox
hung out his tongue or whether he went to eate for it fell out, that a
wrattle snake bitt him by the tongue : & there he dy
These things doe somethinge run in my mind that I cannot have my mind
from this Woman that if shee be not right this way shee may bee a
cause of these things, though I desire to look at the over rulinge
hand of God in all
Testifyed on oath before mee Elizur Holyoke
Testimony of Sarah Bridgeman
Goodwife Bridgman testifyed on oath that last May was a twelve month,
I being brought to bed about 3 days after as I was setting up,
haveinge my child in my lap, there was something ye gave a great blow
on the door , and at very instant as I apprehended my child changed :
& I thought wth my self & told my girle I was afraid my child
would dy . & I sent out the girle to look who it was at the doore,
but shee could see noe body about the house : Presently after the girl
came in, I lookinge towards the doore thorough a hole by the doore, I
saw to my apprehension two women pass by the doore wth white clothes
on ye heads, then I concluded my child would dy indeed : & I sent
out the girle to see who they were but shee could see nor body : this
made mee think there is wickedness in the place : Another tyme ------
Another tyme after this beinge the last summer my boy that is about 11
yeare old sayth as he was going to look our Cowes in a swamp there
came somethinge & gave him a great blow on the head, that it
struck off his hatt & beat him almost to ye ground : he thought it
was a bird but could see nothinge that did it & gonige a little
further he came to 2 loggs & stumbled at one & fell on the
other & put his knee out of joynt : & his knee after was sett
as the man said ye sett it : but he was in grevious torture while the
man stayd wch was 2 days to ye mansadmiration : For he was rather
worse than before & he was in grevious torture about a moth :
& before he was well he cryed out one night it beinge about breake
a day & wth his crying out he awakend my husband : he cryed out
that Goody Parsons would pull off his knee, there shee sitts on the
shelf : then I and my husband labored to quiet him & could hardly
hold him in the bed for he was very feirce : we told him there was noe
body : yea says he there shee sitts on the shelfe : and after he said
there shee is gone & a black mouse followed her : and both I &
my husband told him in this extremity that there was noe body on ye
shelfe yea says he there she is doe you not see her there shee runs
away & a black mouse folllowes her : & this he said many tymes
& wth great violence : & about sun risnige he was like to dy
in our apprehension:
Testifyed on oath before me Elizur Holoyke
Testimony of James Bridgeman and Testimony of William Branch
Testifyed on oath before me Elizur Holoyke
James Bridgman testifed on oath that my child benige at this tyme ill
of his knee, he cryed out & awaked mee : he cryd out his knee
would be pulled off Goody Parsons will pull of my knee : I bid him
hold his peace for there was noe Goody Parsons said I. yea says hee
there shee sitts on the shelfe, I said there is noe body yea sayed he
there shee is & there shee goes away & a black mouse followes
her : & these thigns the child spake with much earnestness:
Testified on oath before mee Elizur Holyoke
Testimony of Thomas Stebbins
William Branch of Springfeild testifyed on oath that when I lived at
the long meddow & Joseph parsons lived there, a certain tyme
Joseph Parsons told mee that where ever he laid the key his wife could
fynd it : & would goe out in the night & that when shee went
out a woman went out wth her & came in wth her but says Joseph
Parsons God preserves his wth his Angells: & further the said
William Branch sayth that while they lived together in the Long
Meddow; George Colton told mee that he followinge Mary Parsons in her
fitt, he followed her thorow the water where he was up to the knees
& shee was not wett : this thing I told to old mr Pynchon when he
was here : who wondered at it but said he could not tell wt to say to
it . Testified on oath before mee Elizur Holyoke
Thomas Stebbin testifyes on oath that when Mr William Pynchon dwelt in
Springfeild Joseph Parsons came to him & asked what he thought of
such a thing as this : that wn a person shall hide a thinge &
another shall fynd it where ever it is laid: as says he, where ever I
hide the key of my doore, my wife will fynd it & gett out, and Mr
Pynchon wonderinge at it said he could not tell wt to say to it, or
what to think of it or words to ye purpose :
Testifyed on oath before mee Elizur Holyoke
William Hannum testifies about his Cow
william hannum being asked what he did with his cow when he had
skined her he said he lett her ly in the yard the first day the next
day in the morning he drew part of the cow downe toward the swamp
before his house
August 16 [16]–56 in the presence of us
william houlton
Tho Bascum
Hanna Lanton testifies about Sara Bridgeman's child
Hanna Lanton testifieth uppon oth that the child of Sara Bridgman
whem she last lay in she being her next neighbor cam to dress her
child not long after she had binn brought a bed and that then the
child of the said Sara had a lousenes and she thought it had taken
could [cold] and tould the said Sara that her child was altered and
that she clouse where lous about it and that she feared it had taken
could for the lower peart of it was could
August 18 [16]–56
in the presence of us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Hanna Broughton testifies about Sara Bridgeman's child
Hanna Broughton testifieth uppon oth that to the best of her
rememberance the child of Sara Bridgman who she last lay in was sick
before the time that the said Sara sat up for she being her next
neighbor on the other said & the said Sara having noe nurse she
& hanna Lanton where often there to loke to the woman & the
child the said hannan also testifieth that the child of the said Sara
was ill as sowne as it was borne
August 18 [16]–56 in the presence of us
William Hulton
Tho Bascum
John Broughton testifies about William Hannum's Cow
John Broughton testifieth that William Hannum cam to him to have him
skine his young cowe that died about march last and when I had skined
his cow and cam to oppon her there was a great quanitity of watter in
the belly of the cow, so much as I and Goodman Hannum judged it to be
4 or five gallons the said John testifieth that the said william
hannum talked to his wife and tould her they need not feare but the
cow died of the water
August 18 [16]56 testified uppon oth before us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
John Webb and George Alexander testify about William Hannum's Cow
John Webb and Georg Allexander testifieth that they asked william
hannum what he thought his cow died of and the said William tould them
that he thught his cow died of the watter for she had a great quantiti
of watter in her belly
August 18 [16]56 testified uppon oth before us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
George Alexander, Samuel Allen, and Goody Webb testify about William
Hannum's Ox
Gorg Allexander Samuell Allin & Goody Webb testifieth that they
where present when the ox of william hannum was stung with the rattle
snake and they did notice nothing but what might com to pass in an
ordinary way and that thy killed the rattle snake
August 18 [16]56 testified uppon oth before us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Margaret Bliss and John Bliss Testify about William Hannum and His
Wife
Margarett Bliss and John Bliss testifieth that william hannum and his
wife said to them the 12 of august last that they had nothing against
mary parsons
August 18 [16]-56 taken uppon oth before us
William Houlton
Tho Bascum
William Hannum and his wife testify that James Bridgeman put them up
to lying
William hannum & his wife said to us that Joams Bridgman hiared
them to downe to Springfeild to give in there testimony or elso they
would not have gone but yt he was very importunate with them
August 18 [16]56 William Houlton
Tho Bascum
Anne Bartlett testifies about Sara Bridgeman's child
The testimony of Anne Bartlet
This deponent testifieth uppon oath that the child of Sara Bridgman
when she last lay in was sicke as sowne as it was borne in so much
that it did groane some thing much and the said Ann Bartlett
testifieth that a littill whille after she went to so the said Sara
and asked how her child did and the said Sara tould her that her child
had the lousness still which it had at tho first and if it continueth
I feare it will be the death of my child. The said Ann Bartlett also
testifieth uppon oath that she watched the child of Sara Bridgman the
same night the child died and then the child had a great lousnes And
the said Sara Bridgman said thus hath it been from the first
August 18 [16]56
In the presence of us
Willi Houlton
Tho Bascum
William Houlton testifies about Sara Bridgeman
William Houlton testifieth uppon oath that Sara Bridgman the wife of
James Bridgman said to him she had such jealousies and suspition of
Mary Parson that she could not be sattisfied unless the said Mary were
searched (?) by women three times
August 18 [16]56
in the presence of us
Tho Bascum
Ed Elmor??
Bond for the Arrest of Sarah Bridgeman
To the Constable of Northampton
By vertue here of you are required to attach the body of Sarah
Bridgman wife of James Bridgman of Northampton and to take Bond of her
to the value of an 100 [pounds] with suficient surty or suerties for
her personall appearance at the next Countey Court held at Cambridg on
the 7th of October next ensuing the date here of Then and there to
answer at the Complaint of Joseph Parsons for Slandering of his
[illegible – probably "wife Mary"] Parsons and to make a true returne
thereof under your hand hereof fayle you not.
Springfield this 8 of September 1656 By the Court
Henry Burt
Constable's Response to the Warrant
[Obscured] of, Sarah Bridgman: and for want of [?] have commited her
to safe custody in northampton shee being weake and with childe is not
able to apeare at this court with out hassard to her life
Allexander Edward constable
Testimony by Simon Beamon regarding Mary Parsons' fits
Simon Beamon testifies, that about the time the witches were
apprehended to be sent to Boston Mr. Moxon's children were taken ill
in their fits (which we took to be bewitched) and at the same time was
Mary Parsons, the wife of Joseph Parsons and other taken with the like
fits so that they were all carried out of the meeting it being Sabbath
day as Mr. Moxon's children acted so did Mary Parsons the wife of
Joseph Parsons, just all one, and I have diverse times been with them
all, and I could discern no difference in their fits[.] And once I
carried Mary Parsons home to the Long Meadow when she was in her fits,
and when she was at home and came to herself she wondered how she came
there, and by the way as I carried her behind me I was fain to hold
her up upon the horse, and I discerned that she did not understand
herself nor where she was, and she would often cry out of the witches
and call to Hannah Smith that they might creep under Goodwife
Warriner's bed (from whence I took her to carry her home) or else the
witches would kill them, she said, and I have at other times been
helping to hold her when she hath been in her fits and have round it
as much as two men could do to hold her in her fits.
Taken upon oath this September 19, 1656 before me John Pynchon. [This transcript appears in Hall, David D. Witch-Hunting in
Seventeenth-Century New England: A Documentary History. Second
Edition Boston: Northeastern U P, 1999. pp 110 - 111.
It is from the original appearing in Autograph File (John Pynchon)
Houghton Library, Harvard University in their collection of
depositions and related documents, "Trials for Witchcraft in New
England"]
Testimony of Richard Sikes about George Colton and Mary Parsons
Rich Svkes affirmeth upon oath, yt about foure yeares agoo, being at
supper at Goodm Coltons : Sam Bliss came in & sd his sister, Mary
Parsons was run downe ye meddow whereuppon I went forth wth G Colton
& we overtooke her presently shee being fallen downe in one of her
fits & we brought her in & laid her on ye bed & shee would
looke fearefully somtymes as if shee saw something, & then bow
downe her head, as others did on theire fits about yt tyme, But I
could [obscured by torn document] & further saith not. ; ; / Taken
upon oath this 27th Sept 1656,
Before me John Pynchon
John Mathews testifies about what he heard Joseph Parsons and Mary
Parsons say
John Mathews testified yt about foure years agoe, being at Joseph
Parsons house making of barrells; uppon occasion of some diffe=rence
betwixt Joseph Parsons & his wife, he sd to his wife yt shee was
led by an evill spirit thereuppon shee sd he was ye cause of it, by
locking her into ye sellar & leaving her : Joseph Parsons, sd
further yt shee went over ye water & Colton after her, & shee
was not wet only Goodm Colton was wet : shee sd also ytt when her
husband lockt her into ye sellar, ye sellar was full of spirits, &
shee threw ye bed stafe at ym & ye bed cloathes & her pillow
& yet they would not be gon ; & from this tyme shee told one
it was yt shee fell into her fits some few days after, shee ye sd Mary
Parsons told me, ye spirits appeard to her like poppets as shee was
washing her cloathes at ye brooke, & then shee fell into her fits
: Mary Parsons ye wife of Joseph Parsons further told me yt in her
fits, shee hath gon from her house in ye long meddow thorough ye grt
swamp in her shift, & when shee came to her self shee could not
tell how shee came thither:
Taken upon oath this 27th of September 1656 before mee
John Pynchon
Samuell Bartlett's Complaint against Mary Parsons
Samll Bartlet of Northampton having lately lost his wife to his
greate greife as he expresseth and ye rather for ye he strongly
suspects yt she dyed by some unusuall meanes, viz, by meanes of some
evell Instruemt he presented to this Corte diverse evedences to shew
the grounds of his feares & suspicioun Alsoe Goodman Bridgeman
finding so ye Corte & Intreateing that Diligent inquisition may be
made concurring ye Death of ye sayd Woeman his Daughter for yt he also
Strongly suspects she come to her and by some unlawfull &
unatureall means & for ye Diverse of ye testemonyes doe reflect on
Goodwife Parsones Sen of Northampton ye Corte haveing read ye
testemonyes doe thinks it meete yt ye case should be ffurther lookt
into & therefore doe refferr ye sayd case & all other things
Concerning ye sayd Goodwife Parsons yt have beene now Presented to ye
ajournmt of this Corte which is to be kept at Northampton ye 18th Day
of November next, for further Disquition & doe order yt she be
warned thereto attend to answer wt shall be objected agst her & ye
wittnesses are to be warned to appeare to testify before her viva vere
wt they have already given in upon oath concerning her
John Mathews Denies Suspecting Mary Parsons
John Mathews affirmeth yt he hath at persent noe grounds of jealousy
for himselfe, of Mary Parsons ye wife of Joseph Parsons, to be a
witch, & yt what he testified yesterday on oath was uppon ye
earnest Importunity of James Bridgeman & his Brother; further ye
sd Jno Mathews affirmeth that when he was at worke at Joseph Parsons
house there came a greate clap of thunder suddenly, whereat Mary
Parsons wth ye fright fell downe in a swoone, in my sight: John
Mathews further saith yt he never spake a word to James Bridgeman or
his wife of that wch I testified yesterday [blotted] I [blotted] spake
it before ye Comissioners, & heretoe I set my marke
Before me John Pynchon
Springfeild 30th of September 1656
John Pynchon Testifies that he has never made or heard any reports
of Mary Parsons
Being requested by Goodwife Parsons to givfe this testimony wch
testifies of my hearing some report concerning Goodwife Parsons, yt
gave me occasion to say : If yt were true, Goodwife parsons could not
be right, shee ye sd Goodwife Parsons desiring me to declare whether I
sd so, & wt reports I heard of her, I accordingly declare, yt to
my remembrance I never sd any such word, neither doe I remem=ber any
reports that I have heard wch have given me occasion to speake any
such words of Goodwife parsons : & heretoe I set my hand this 30th
of September 1656.
John Pynchon
Decision of the Court in the Slander Suit
The court having read the attachments and perused the evidences
repectively presented on both sides which are on file with the records
of this court do fined that the defendant hath without just ground
raised a great scandal and reproach upon the plaintiff's wife: and do
therefore order that t defendant shall make acknowledgement before the
inhabitants of the place where the said parties dwell: Viz.
Northampton and also at Springfield at some public meeting at each
place by order of Myr. Pynchon or Mr. Holyoke or either of them and in
such words and manner as shall be suitable satisfaction for such an
offence and the same to be testified under the hands of the said Mr.
Pynchon and Mr. Holoyke, within 60 days next ensuing and in case of
default having notice of the tiem at each place the said defendant
viz. James Bridgeman shall pay damages to the plaintiff ten pounds
sterling : Also this court doth order that the defendant shall pay to
the plaintiff his costs of court viz. seven pounds one shilling and
eight pence. [October 7, 1656] [This transcript appears in Hall, David D. Witch-Hunting in
Seventeenth-Century New England: A Documentary History. Second
Edition Boston: Northeastern U P, 1999. pp 111 - 112.
The original source is James R. Trumbull, History of Northampton
(1898) 1, p. 51]
The Case of Mary Parsons at the Court of Assistants at Boston
The following are transcripts copied from Records of the Court of
Assistants of the Colony of the Massachusetts Bay 1630 - 1692.
A note about these transcriptions, as copied from the source book:
Printed under the supervision of John Noble Clerk of the Supreme
Judicial Court Volume 1 Boston Published by the County of Suffolk
1901. "Seconde Booke of Records Begunne the 3d of March 1673" is an
original volume of records, written out by Edward Rawson, is a
complete record of the Court from March 3rd 1673 to April 22nd 1686
and from December 24th 1689 until early in 1692. By this time, the
Court of Assistants was a "purely judicial body" (x), and was "the
Court of highest original jurisdiction in causes civil and criminal"
(x). The text was edited by John Noble and completed in 1910.
Appearing on page 31 of this volume:
The Grand Jury was Called againe and they pervsing seuerall euidences
sent doune from the County Court at North Hampton relating to mary
Parsons the wife of Joseph Parson they presenting an Idictment against
hir on suspicion of witchcraft leaving hir to further trjall The Court
Ordered hir Comittment to the prison in Boston there to remaine &
be kept in order tryall . . . This Court is Adjourned to the 13th of
may next at 10 of the clock in the morning It is ordered that the
Secretary Issue out his warrants for such & so many of the
wittnesses as once wthin a moneth mr Danforth mr Tinge & major
Clark shall wth the Secret. on their pervsall determine to be
necessary and that a letter be writt to major Pynchon to Accommodate
yt Affaire Relating to mary Parsons
Appearing on page 33 of this volume:
Att A Court of Assistants on Adjournment held at Boston 13th of may
1675 Att this Court Mary Parsons the wife of Joseph Parsons of
Northampton in the Cunty of Hampshire in the Colony of the
Massachusetts being presented & Indicted by the Grand Jury was
also Indicted by the name of Mary Parsons the wife of Joseph Parsons
for not hauing the feare of God before hir eyes and being Instigated
by the divill hath at one or other of the times mentioned in the
euidences now before ye Court entered into familliarity wth the divill
and Comitted seuerall acts of witchcraft on the person or persons of
one or more as in the sajd euidences relating thereto refference being
thereto had Amply doeth and may appeare and all this Contrary to the
peace of our Soueraigne Lord the king his Croune and Dignity the lawes
of God and of this Jurisdiction == After the Indictment and Euidences
in the Case were Read the prisoner at the barr holding vp hir hand
& pleading not Guilty putting hirself on hir triall, the Jury
brough in their virdict they found hir not Guilty -- & so she was
dischardged ==
Joseph Parsons Licensed to keep an Ordinary
Joseph Parsons of Northampton is by this Corte lycensed to keepe an
Ordinary or house of Comon Entertaymnt, in the Towne of Northampton
for the yeare ensueing and he hath liberty grannted him to sell wines
or strong liquors as need shall require: Provided he keepe good rule
& order in his house
Joseph Parsons charged with Lascivious Carriage
The Jury presenting Joseph Parsons Senor to this Corte for lacivious
carriage towards some women of Northamp vizt Hannah Roote &
Goodwife Salmon : The Corte did [???] the case, & did judge that
there are grounds to feare??? & Suspect that Joseph Parsons hath
misdemeaned himselfe towards the said women : And therefore the Corte
did admonish the said Joseph concerning the suspition of such
miscarriages
Joseph Parsons Presented for Contemptuous Behavior
Joseph Parsons being presented for contemptuous behaviour towards
Northampton Comissioners & towards ye Selectmen for disorderly
carriage when ye Company were about theyer of Military Officers he is
by this Corte fyned to ye County in ye Summe of 20 p to be pd to ye
County Treasurer And for buach [?] of the Law in suffering Harricks ye
Dutchman to Spend his tyme & assets in his the said Josephs house
ye Ordinary the said Joseph Parsons is by this Corte fyned to ye
County in ye summe of 40 [?] to be pd to ye County Treasurer
Joseph Parsons takes an Oath of Fidelity
Joseph Parsons Junior John Bridgeman John Hilliard Preserve : Clapp
John Woodman John Hulband Samuell Davis Josph Edwards Benjamin Edwards
Samell Marshall Nathaneell Wellet Jono Roote Jno Alexander William
Pipley Micah Midge Tho Lyman Samuell Holton Jonathan Marsh William
Holton & Timothy Baker did all of them in presence of this Corte
take the Oath of fidelity to this Collony
Widow Mary Parsons: Dispute over the title to the Springfield Home
She adminestrated to ye Estate of Cornet Joseph Parsons deceased viz
Mary Parsons the widdow, Joseph Parsons & John Parsons, adminegh
trato ye aforesd Plaintiffs & Major John Pynchon Esq, defend him
an action of the Case for neglect of secureing & deffending sd
adminestrator Right to containe lands in Springfeild acceeding to a
deed under this hand & seale In which so admmestrated are Molested
by a writt of dowrye to ye Relict of Lett Thomas Stebbouper alrae Mss
Blark & all acording to attachments entrie Money 10 s
In the action depending in Corte betweene Widdow Parsons Joseph
Parsons John Parsons Plts & Major John Pynchon Esq defend the
testimonyes & evedences in the case being produced & read in
Corte & comitted to the jury they brought in there verdict that
they find for ye defendent Costs of Corte as bill allowed of in Corte
at 00 17 00
Bond signed by Joseph Parsons
Bond written by Cornet Joseph Parsons of Northampton, Mass. 24 March
1663/4.
...A reproduction of the bond was transcribed by Gerald J. Parsons,
F.A.S.G. 21 July 1993...
marche 24 : [16] 63 64
Knowe all men by this presente that Joseph parsons of north hamtone
for my selfe and wife dooe bind my selfe in a bande of twentey pound
to thomos roote Senyer and Josof Roote and tomas Solmon not to trobell
aney of them or thar wifes for aney doefrance that was bee twene aney
of theme abowte giveng thare othes in to the comesheners of north
hamton whare in they sayd that thare was som mescareg doone by him I
Josof parsones by this writeng dooe fooley aqite the fore named
parsones of aney wrong doon to him and dooe & shall berey the sayd
as if it had nover ben in word or deed to him: and dooe fooley aquite
thos[e] parsons so that thare may be no more dofrance abowte that
thinge or thinges but in after time the sayd Josof or marey or aney of
his should trobell aney of thes[e] aboofe parsons spesified the sayd
Josof parsons dooe owe to paye to him or them aney one of them twontey
pownde Joseph parsons
Wittness
Enos kingsly
marke of
Sary kingsly
Court case against Joseph Willistone regarding Parsons Estate
An Account of severll particulars of Good in the Custody of Joseph
Willistone which belong to Mr Joseph Parsons Deceased & for Mrs
Mary Parsons Deceased of which Joseph Parsons Jr and Capt, to Parsons
Administration, to a ye Deceased Estates Complain to ye Judge of
Probate that they are taen by said Willistone in a Clandistine way
which are as followeth -----
A Deed of sale of ye homelot he sd Willistone lives on which was
obtained of Coll Pynchon
A silver bowl holds a pint a bed Blankets a brass kettle holds about a
pail full _ a pair of hatchels
a frying pan a looking glass twelve pounds four shillings in Money
& something more a bolster filled with featheres
Dated 18 March 1723 Joseph Parsons John Parsons Administrators as
aforesd
Joseph Willistone being cited to appear before me under named Judge of
Probate this 19th day of March 1723 to answer Joseph Parsons Esq. for
that sd williston had in a clandestine way concealed certain
particulars of their fathers & Mothers Deceased their Estates to
which sd Willistone gave an Acctt as follows
Viz: 1 Joseph Parsons charged sd Willistone with keeping &
Concealing a Deed they or their Mother had obtained of Coll Pynchon of
ye hometed sd Willistone hath built & now lives upon to which sd
Williston saith he had none of it nor directly nor indirectly knew
nothing of it nor where it was
2 Willistone was charged that he had a Silver Cup of a pint and a
looking Glass to which he said his Mother gave them both to her
daughter Mary Parsons sd Willistone late wife
3 Willistone was charged with a brass kettle of a pailful & half
to which he saith ye kettle was in being they might have it if they
see cause
4 Willistone was charged with a pair of hatchets & a frying pan
which he had them on Acct of Det due to him or they might have them
paying to him his Debt
5 Willistone was charged with 19/17 Money to which he Answered he had
but 9/18 that he had for debt due to him
6 Willistone was charged with a feather pillow for a bed to which he
answered ye pillow was to a bed he had on his wives Mary Portion by
them that was changed for one yt was not a ye so good
To ye above ye Acctt Joseph Willistone made oath this 19th March 1723
so ye above Acct, that was A true account in all the partiuclars as
above, before me Samll Partridge Judge of Probate
Source: Historic Northampton and UMass IT Center for Educational
Software Development at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, The
Goody Parsons Educational Web Site, https://ccbit.cs.umass.edu/parsons/hnmockup/home.html,
retrieved 21 Oct 2017.
Hartford, Connecticut Probate Records
Name: Thomas Bliss
Location: Hartford
Date of Will: 14 Feb 1650
Page: 28
Full text: Invt. œ86-12-08. Taken 14 February, 1650,
by Nathaniel Ward, Joseph Mygatt. Nuncupative Will. Testimony of John
Pinchon & Hen: Smith gives property to his wife. Mary Parsons, a
daughter, of Springfield, doth Testify to the same.Court Record, Page
17--20 February, 1650-1: Adms. to the Relict, She to keep the whole
Estate in her Hands for her Use and the Education of the Children
during her life, then to be divided among the Children, viz: to
Lawrence, to John, to Samuel, to Hester, to Elizabeth, to Hannah, and
to Sarah Bliss.
Source: A DIGEST OF THE EARLY CONNECTICUT PROBATE
RECORDS.1650 to 1663.
Source: Ancestry.com. Hartford, Connecticut Probate Records, 1639-1700
[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2000.
Original data: A Digest of the Early Connecticut Probate Records,
Hartford District, 1635-1700. Vol. I. n.p., 1906.
New London (Conn.) Probate Record
BLISS, ELIZABETH, of Norwich. File No. 584. Inventory of the estate
of Elizabeth Bliss of Norwich, who deceased 28 Feb. 1699/1700, taken
by Thomas Leffingwell and Caleb Abell, Selectmen. The names of the
children: Samll, Elizabeth, Sarah, Mary, Deliverance, Ann, and
Rebeccah.
Source: Jacobus, Donald Lines, "New London (Conn.) Probate Record," The
American Genealogist, Vol. 10, 1933, p. 36.
THE ESTATE OF CORNET JOSEPH PARSONS
(This is a copy re-typed from the transcript by Gerald J. Parsons.
Edits are forthcoming.)
The Inventory and Settlement of the Estate of Cornet Josph Parsons are
recorded in Book 1, pages 235 and 236, of the Hampshire County Court
Records, Hampshire Registry of Probate, Northampton, Massachusetts.
These instruments were recorded at the County Court held at
Northampton on 25 March, 1684, and following is a copy:
Mrs Mary Parsons Widdow Relect to Cornet Joseph Parsons Senr late
deceased of Springfd prsented to this Corte an Inventory of her late
hushands Estate to which she made Oath & power of adminestration
is granted to ye sd Widdow Mary Parsons to Joseph Parsons Eldest Son
& to John Parsons 2d Son to ye deceased And sd deceased dyeing
intestate the Setlement of ye Estate is as ffollows –
Here ffolloweth a Coppy of ye Inventory of ye Estate of Cornet Parsons
deceased
L
s d
Impr To his purss & apparrell
at
09 15 00
To a house & homestead in Northampton formerly mr ffitches &
23 acres of meadow Ld in Northampton & Moveable Estate ded to
Joseph Parsons Jur as his portion all
at
225
00 00
To his homelot & Orchard yt was mr Williams in Northampton &
23 acres of Ld in ye meadow at Northampton & Moveable Estate ded
to John Parsons as his portion
at
160 00 00
To a homelot in Northampton & 23 acres of Ld in ye meadow with
moveable Estate ded to Saml Parsons as his portion
at 160
00 00
To a homlot in Northamption & 23 acres of Ld in ye Meadow with
Moveable Estate ded to Jonth Parsons as his portion
at 160
00 00
To 34 acres of Ld in ye meadows at Northampton at 6 L
p
204 00 00
To all his Ld in Pascomock within ye Lymits of
Northampton
130 00 00
To all his Lds in ye place Comonly called Wesquakege
at
040 00 00
To ye houses & Lds in Springfd in ye Town & at falls
at
230 00 00
To a house & homestead in Boston & Remayns of a place &c
for a Warehouse ye house being burnt down
at
300 00 00
To Living Stock at 45 L 15s Swine at
35s
047 10 00
To Cart wheels, plow, harrow, Chaines, timbr Chaine fitrs all
at
005 10 00
To Corn & hay 10 L 6 s One Ox hide
15s
011 01 00
To shoes 15s flax 30s Peuter Vessells at
10L
012 05 00
To Tinn & glasses 10s Earthen Ware
10s
001 00 00
To Brass Kettells Skillits Warmeing pann & other small
things
008 10 00
To iron pots 6L 10s diapr Cloath at 2L
5s
008 15 00
To Lying Cloath 45L 13s beds & bedding at
50L
095 15 00
To besteads 40s Chests & trunck at 8L
15s
010 15 00
To boxes at 30s tables at 40s Silver plate at
5L
008 10 00
To hats 4L 5s Sadle, bredle, pistols, holsters at 4L
13s
008 18 00
To Chaires Quishons & stooles at 4L baggs at
50s
006 10 00
To a Screw & Stilliards at 3L Cubbird Cloath & small things
4L
007 00 00
To nayles 2L bees & honey at 3L
15s
005 15 00
To old Cask & bolting mill at 2L Other small tools
35s
003 15 00
To Mauls 20s Meale Sives & Corne Sives at
10s
001 10 00
To a Pannell & pilion with 3 yds Cloath 2L 9s 1 yd Cloath
7s
002 16 00
To Indian Corn 24s Carte rope & spining wheels at
29s
02 13 00
To Braided baskets & flasket at 15s bees Wax at
10s
01 05 00
To Cutlash rapiour & silk Scraffe
at
02 10 00
To pillian 30s Guns 45s green sey 40s Lining Yarn
32s
05 07 00
To iron tramels pothooks firepann Chaffingdish and irons all
at
04 00 00
To betle Wedges & a Chaine 15s bellows, hamr, slice all at
8s
01 04 00
To a Lookeing glass 8s pork book tallo Chess, buttr
Suiet
15 14 00
To a Cowle half bushll Corn treys, dishes, trenchers sithing
dish
01 13 00
To a pt of a Saw mill at 30L Gun at 16s hetchell
8s
31 04 00
To Severall things at Josephs 40s by Severalls of ye Estate in debts
taken & Some things Sold at
10L
12 00 00
In John Parsons hands 86L in Saml Parsons hands
16L10s
102 10 00
In Jonathan Parsons hands 20L in debt due from D Morgan
8L
028 00 00
To part of a Saw mill at Haddam
at
012 00 00
To Hats in Hadley
at
004 00 00
2088 09 00
Taken pr John Dumbleton
Benj Parsons
John Hitchcock
A Setlement of ye Estate of Cornet Jospeph Parsons
Senr deceased
Whereas by ye alwise disposeing hand of God (Joseph Parsons late of
Springfeild) is taken Out of ye Land of ye Living, his awfull
afflicting hand as we his Sirvivers desire Senceably to be affected
with Soe humble to Submitt to his holy Will & good pleasure &
although sd Joseph Parsons by his Pruedent Care was thoughtfull &
Stuedious Soe to dispose of wt Estate God had blessed him with, Soe as
might bee for ye use & Comfort of his deere Wife & Children
Sirvivers as aforesd yet Notwithstanding by Reason yt ye Last Will
& testiment of ye deceased aforementioned was made about Seven
yeares Since & attended with some imperfections wrby it was
doubtfull wheather it would stand in law ye deceased had Concluded by
Some alteration of sd Testiment & acted accordingly So farr as he
had libertie & advantage So to doe & accordingly to his fowr
Sons had distrebuted while living as in his book under his hand
appears & by a papr in ordr to a further declareing of his mynde
as to ye dispossall of his Estate then the aforementioned will, wch
was not perfected alsoe, by Reason of Weakness & ilness
interposeing incapasitateing him accordingly & therein is
expressed his tendr respect unto his deere Wife & two his fowr
daughters alsoe appointeing to sd Daughters 100L apeice & to his
Wife aforesd wn all portions are payd & set Out to Each Legattee
aforementioned ye Remaindr of his whole Estate (debts being payed) to
be to her free & absalute dispose, And therefore we ye sd
Sirvivers, have mutually agreed * Concluded as to a Setlemt of ye
Estate aforementioned, wch we intend humbly to propose to ye Cortes
Consideration & determination, it shall be as ffolloweth –
That Joseph Jur Eldest Son to the deceased shall have Out of his
fathers Estate as his portion One homelot with an house On it which
was formerly Bought of mr Joseph ffitch as it is Cituate within ye
Township of Northampton abutting on ye house Lot of Samll Wright
Northerly Town Streete Southerly high way Westerly & a house Lot
of John Broughtons Easterly, & three acres of meadow Land in the
tract of Land Comonly called old Rainebow, Bounded by Land of John
Lymans Senr Southerly & Land of Deacon judds Northerlie the
Rainebow hill Westerly & ye Rever Easterly, Seven acres & a
half of Ld formerly Bought of John Bliss, Bounded by Rainebow hill
Easterly a high way Westerly & Southerly; by Land of Johan
Woodwords Northerlie, five acres of pastor Land Bouned by Land of
Benoenie Stebbins Southeast & Land of Nehemiah Allins South &
Ld of Thomas Bascombs North & Easterly by an high way &
Westerly by Land of Isaack sheldings, three acres of Grass Land in
middle meadow, Bouned by Joseph Roots Land South the Remayndr of ye
deceaseds Lot North & a high way West & ye River East & in
moveable Estate to ye vallue of One hundred twenty five Pounds wch he
hat already Received –
To John Parsons 2d Son to ye deceased Land formerly Bought of mr
Williams a homelot and Ortchard Cituate within ye Townshipp of
Northampton Bounded by a homelot of Christopher Smiths South & by
a homelot formerly Henry Conliffs North, high way Westerly & Land
of John Langtons Easterly, ten acres of meadow Land in Northampton
meadow boundd by a high way East & West & Joseph Roots Land
Northerlie & Samll Wrights Land Southerlie, five acres of grass Ld
in middle meadow bounded by Ld of Samll Bartlits Southerlie & John
Stebbins Land Northerly high way west & ye River East Eight acres
& a half of Land bounded by Land of John Holtons Northerlie &
Land of Samll Parsons Southerlie, a high way East & West all wch
is vallued at 130L & in moveable goods which he hath already Recd
vallued at 30L –
To Samll Parsons 3d Son to the deceased a homelot Cituate within sayd
Townshipp of Northampton by Estimation fowr acres, Bounded by a high
way Westerlie, Easterlie by ye Comons, by a homelot of John Parsons
Southerlie & by a homelot of John Allexandrs Northerlie; Eight
acres of Land in ye Meadow, Bouned by ye Town fence Westerlie a high
way East, by Land of John Bridgmans Southerlie, & Ld of Jno Parons
North, three acres of Land in old Rainebow, Bounded by Wm Millers and
Southerlie & Ld of Samll Allins Northerlie by a high way West and
ye River east, two acres & a half in young Rainebow, Bounded by Ld
of Jaohn Hannums South, & Wm Millers Land Northerlie by a high way
West & east, five acres of Land yt was fomerly Walter Lees Land
Bounddd by Land of Isaack sheldings Northerlie & Land of Ricd
Lymans Southerlie, & by a high way Weat & east, One acres of
Land in ye Meadow Comonly clled Munhann Bought of Capt Cooke, three
acres & a half of Ld Bounded East & West by ye high wayes,
& by Lad of Widdow Goodmans Souterhlie & by ye Remayndr of sd
deceaseds Lot Northerlie, all vallued at 130L/10s & in moveable
Estate wch he hath already Recd 29L/10s –
To Jonathan Parsons 4th Son to ye deceased a homelot Cituate in the
Townshipp of Northampton, Conteineing two acres, bounded by a high way
Easterlie ye Comons Northerlie & South by John Parsons homelot
& by a homelot of Saml Parsons West, And nineteene acres of Meadow
Land in Northampton aforesd, Bounded by a high way South & North
& By Land of Wm Millers East, & Land of Mathew Cleasons West,
And fowr acres of Meadow in Munhann formerly Bought of Goodman
Hatchet, Boundd by ye River Easterlie, & Ld of Timothy Bakers
Westerlie & John Clarkes Land Northerlie & Land of Allexandr
Edwardes Southerlie all vallued at 125L & in moveable Estate wch
he hath already Recd to ye full vallue of 35L –
As alsoe to ye Widdow Marsy Parons Relict to ye deceased all ye
Remayder of her sd husbands Estate both reall & personall wr Ever
it is to be found Either in Sprinfeild, Northampton, Boston,
Wesquaakege or Elce where with all prveledges & appurtenanes
Revertiion or Revertions to be at her free & absalute dispose with
this proviso, If she see Cause to make Sale of any of ye Lds, now at
her dispose, then ye Sons of sd Joseph Parsons Senr deceased shall
have ye libertie before any other to purchase ye sd Lands, agreeing
with yr mother, & not to be alianated to any other person or
persons wt soever till sd Sons all of ym refuse to purchase sd Lands,
as alsoe sd Widdow Mary Parsons Relict to ye deceased aforementioned,
to pay or Cause to be payd all debts due from ye Estate & to the
sayd Joseph Parsons fowr Daughters One hundered Pounds apeice to Mary
Parons One Hundered Pounds, to Hanah Parsons One Hundered Pouns To
Abigaile Parsons One hundered Pounds to Easter Parsons One hundered
Pounds to be payd to ym & Either of ym in good Current pay &
other goods out of ye Estate & at such tyme as the sd Mary Parsons
Widdow can conveniently doe it To all wch as ye joynt agrement &
Conclution of ye sd Widdow & her children as to a Setlment of sd
Estate, & an Issue of all further troubles, disatisfactions, &
desturbances, as to any, Rights, titles, Claimes, any ways Contrary or
in Obstruction or Ejection of ye aforsd prmises, but they may stand
Coninue & abide as a full Setlement of sd Estate & alsoe agree
to prsent ye prmises as prposalls to ye next Countie Corte for their
aprobation & Confirmation, if they judge meete & Convenient
Soe to doe to wch as or joynt agreement we sd Relict & Sirvivers
have Subscribed this 15th day of Janr 1683 as Witness or hands
Witnesses to this agremt
John Pynchon
Samll Partrigg
Mary Parsons
her mark
Joseph Parsons
John Parons
Samll Parsons
Jonth Parsons
Mary Parsons
Hanah Parsons
Abigaile Parsons
Easter Parsons
undr her Marke
Allowed & Confirmed as a Setlemt of Cornet Joseph Parons Senrs
Estate ye above sayd as attest S Partrigg at Corte this mch 25 1684
Clerk
Source: Historic Northampton and UMass IT Center for Educational
Software Development at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, The
Goody Parsons Educational Web Site, https://ccbit.cs.umass.edu/parsons/hnmockup/home.html,
retrieved 21 Oct 2017.